420. Some geometry problems for high school II.
by Virgil Nicula, Mar 28, 2015, 4:35 PM
P1 (Miguel Ochoa Sanchez, Peru). Let an isosceles
with
. Its incircle
touches
,
in
,
respectively. Choose an arbitrary
point
which belongs to the minor arc
of
. The tangent at
in
cuts
,
In
,
respectively. Prove that
(constant).
Proof. Denote
and
. Apply the Newton's theorem to
, i.e.
. Now I"ll use the van Aubel's
theorem to
in
. Thus, 
(constant).
Generalization. Let
with the incircle
and two points
,
. Prove that
is tangent to
(constant).
Proof 1. Let:
,
;
,
;
,
. Therefore, 

. In conclusion, 
. Observe that
. Hence
![$r[(x+y)-(s-a)]\implies$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/1/9/219c3814ff512f72d70ba8ef1ba762ddc43ecfb2.png)
, i.e.
.
Proof 2. Let the incircle
,
and
.
Thus,
and
. Hence:

.
and




Particular cases.
If
is equilateral, then
.
If
is
-isosceles, i.e.
, then
. So
.
P2. Let
with incircle
and
. Let incenters
,
of
,
. Prove that
is cyclic
.
Proof.
and the projections
of 
. Thus, 
. So
is cyclic

.
Generalization. Let
, its interior
,
and
. Prove that
is cyclic
.
Proof.
is cyclically
.
Particular case. If
is the incenter of
and
,
are the incenters of
,
respectively , where
ia a mobile point of 
obtain that
(constant).
P3. Let an
-isosceles
and
so that
. i.e.
is a deltoid.
Denote
,
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote: the midpoint
of
, i.e.
; the projections
,
of
on
,
respectively. Observe that
and prove easily that (Stewart)
. Thus,
.
Particular case.
.
Lemma. Let
and the points
. Prove that
.
P4. Let
with the incircle
and the Gergonne's point
. Denote
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
. Is well-known that
, where
. Therefore, that 
. From the van Aubel's relation obtain that
. Apply the upper lemma in 
![$\frac {PC}{PB}=\frac {(s-c)[b(s-b)-a(s-a)]}{(a-c)(s-b)^2}=$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/2/d/42dd29b4ac713050f8a0b1c9899709668ff58c25.png)
. Particular case.
.
Remark. Denote
and apply the upper lemma to the triangle
.
P5. Let
be a triangle. Consider the points
,
,
,
. Prove easily that (for example, with areas)
.
Proof.
Apply the theorem of Sinus in the mentioned triangles:

. Otherwise (with areas).
.
Apply the relation
in the mentioned triangles:
.
First method. Denote
. Thus,

what is true because

. In conclusion,
.
Second method. Denote
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversals 

.
Remark. For third relation can use an equivalent form :
.
Application 1. Let
be a triangle, let
,
,
so that 
and let
,
,
so that
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
. Apply the Ceva's theorem to the concurrent lines
.
Apply upper relation
.
P6. In acute
, an arbitrary
is chosen on altitude
. Let
,
be the midpoints of
,
respectively. The perpendiculars from
to
and from
to
meet at
. Prove that
.
Proof. From
. Since
obtain that
Since
obtain that
, i.e.
.
P7 (E. Vargas Diaz). Semicircle
with diameter
and
semicircle
with diameter
and semicircle
with diameter
which
are interior to
the circle
which is interior tangent to
at
and is exterior tangent to
,
at
,
respectively. Let
. Prove that
is tangent to
.
Proof 1 (synthetic). Denote radical centers
. Thus,
is incircle of
and
. Let 
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to
and 
Remark.
.
.
.
.
Proof 2 (metric). Observe that
and
. Apply the Stewart's relation to the cevian
and 

, i.e.
.
Apply Menelaus' theorem to
and
. Thus, 
Thus,
. Apply Stewart's relation to
and

. Therefore,
is tan. to



what is truly. In conclusion,
is tangent to
.
P8 (Cristian Tello). Let the circle
with the diameter
and the circle
what is interior tangent
to the circle
at the point
and is tangent to
at
so that
. Prove that
.
Proof. Let the diameter
of
. Thus,
.
Lemma. Let
and fixed
,
. Prove that the geometric locus of mobile interior
w.r.t. given angle for which
(constant) is a line.
Particular cases.
Let convex
so
and
is a "complete quadrilateral"
. Prove that the midpoints of diagonals
,
,
are collinear.
If
is a tangential (circumscribed) quadrilateral with the incenter
, then
where
,
are the midpoints of the diagonals (Gauss ' line).
Application. Let the tangential
with the incenter
and the midpoint
of
. Denote
. Prove that
.
P9. Let
and
so that
. Let
. Prove that
.
Proof. Let
and let the midpoint
of
. Since
, we have that
is cyclic. Since
and
, we see
that
is the center of the circumcircle of
. Thus,
. Now,
. It follows that 
, so
. Yet,
is a midline of
, so
, which means that
. Yet,
is on the perpendicular bisector of 
since
, so
is on the perpendicular bisector of
, so
. Similarly,
. Notice that
and
, so
. So
. Similarly,
, so
, so
is cyclic. Since
, we have
that
on the perpendicular bisector of
. Similarly, it lies on the perpendicular bisector of
, so
is the circumcenter of
. It follows that
.
P10. Let
be a triangle for which
,
. Consider the points
so that
,
. The line
cut again the circumcircle
of
in
and the line
cut again the circumcircle of
in
. Prove that
and
.
Proof. Using the power of a point w.r.t. a circle obtain :
. Since
,
,
results
and
. Therefore,
a.s.o.
Remarks. If
, then
. Here is an identity with many applications
, where
and
. This
identity is equivalently with the relation
. Prove similarly that 
Let
for which
. Consider the points
,
so that
,
. The line
cut again the circumcircle of
in
and
cut again the circumcircle of
in
. Prove that
, where
,
- an analytical geometry on the orientated line
.
Let
be a triangle . Consider the points
so that
,
and
,
. The line
cut
again the circumcircle of
in
and the line
cut again the circumcircle of
in
. Prove that 
Let
and
so that
. The lines
. Prove that
.
Let an
-right
and
(line !) so that
. Prove that
.
P11 (E. Vargas Diaz). Let a convex
which is inscribed in
with the diameter
. Denote
. Prove that
Proof.
. Let
and
Aubel's relation to
in
. Menelaus' theorem

Very nice problem!
An easy extension. Let a convex
what is inscribed in the circle
and
. For a point 
denote
. Prove that
where
.
Proof 1. Let
and apply Aubel's relation to
in
. Apply the Stewart's relation to the cevian
in 
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversals
and
respectively 
.
Remark. Get analogously
. From the product of
and
.
Proof 2 (Suli). Let the circumcircles of
,
intersect
at
,
respectively. Observe that
. Therefore,
. In conclusion, 
.
P12. Let
such that
. Let
such that
. The incircle
of
touches its
sides in
and
. Let
be the incircle of
. Denote
. Prove that
.
Proof.. The incircle
touches
in
,
and
. Observe that
.
Thus,
. Since
obtain that
. Denote
. The
property
is well-known (see the lower remark). Thus,
is cyclically. Analogously
, i.e.
. Observe that 
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to transversal
in
:

. So
the quad.
is cyclically
or 
P13 (M. O. Sanchez). Let an equilateral
with the circumcircle
and a mobil point
so that
separates
and
Denote
the midpoints
of the
arcs
respectively so that
separates
and
separates
the intersections
and
Prove that 
Proof. Is well-known the Pompeiu's theorem
(is a particular case of the Ptolemy's theorem). The rays
are the bisectors of the angles

and the points
are the symmetrical points of
w.r.t. the lines
respectively. Hence
Therefore,
and 
In conclusion,
Very nice problem!
Remark. Apply the Pascal's theorem to the cyclical hexagon
P14 (Thanasis Gakopoulos, Greece). Prove that
there is the inequality
(standard notations).
Proof 1. Observe that
Denote the projections
and 
where is well known that
Hence

I"ll apply now the well known inequality
i.e. 
In conclusion,

Proof 2.
is inscribed in the circle with the diameter
a.s.o.
P15 (Thanasis Gakopoulos, Greece). Prove that
there is the identity
(standard notations).
Proof. Have from the upper problem
and
Thus,

On other hand,







point

![$\overarc[]{TS}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/3/3/933e3e28708bdaed75813dee69c4b5b50284671d.png)








Proof. Denote




theorem to











Generalization. Let







Proof 1. Let:

















![$[MAN]=[AEIF]-[IFMNE]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/4/0/540ac91c155c8f3219b367f87630aff05c2ed13e.png)
![$2[IEA]-2[MIN]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/3/8/b38c10a54656f66a59fc68df7645223901136a58.png)

![$r[2(s-a)-(x+y)]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/7/6/f765d8bb77afb3a868d7d77b2e3eeb49b172d90e.png)
![$r[(x+y)-(s-a)]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/1/9/219c3814ff512f72d70ba8ef1ba762ddc43ecfb2.png)
![$[MAN]=r[(x+y)-(s-a)]\ (2)\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/e/a/9eab1ee194f2e04226139ec82c13a8161d2d3e5b.png)
![$\frac {[MAN]}{[ABC]}=\frac {[MAN]}{S}=\frac {xy}{bc}\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/3/8/838e9ce45008be7db4e7585eaa3096e09a07aa54.png)
![$[MAN]=\frac {xyrs}{bc}\stackrel{(2)}{\implies}\frac {xyrs}{bc}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/5/8/858535cbc4040dd68a496cd43fe0374b09db703f.png)
![$r[(x+y)-(s-a)]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/1/9/219c3814ff512f72d70ba8ef1ba762ddc43ecfb2.png)


Proof 2. Let the incircle



Thus,




















Particular cases.












P2. Let









Proof.

















Generalization. Let






Proof.





Particular case. If








obtain that




P3. Let an





Denote




Proof. Denote: the midpoint

![$[AD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/3/0f3e4c424371b27673db323ced8ef0777940c0d4.png)













Particular case.




Lemma. Let



P4. Let





Proof. Denote











![$\frac {PC}{PB}=\frac {(s-c)[b(s-b)-a(s-a)]}{(a-c)(s-b)^2}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/2/d/42dd29b4ac713050f8a0b1c9899709668ff58c25.png)






Remark. Denote




P5. Let






Proof.




![$\frac {XB}{XC}=\frac {[XAB]}{[XAC]}=\frac {AX\cdot AB\cdot\sin \widehat{XAB}}{AX\cdot AC\cdot\sin\widehat{XAC}}\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/b/5/db59b79cf0c661e658b6a0ab8b19f6700b980adb.png)















Second method. Denote












Remark. For third relation can use an equivalent form :

Application 1. Let





and let





Proof. Denote


Apply upper relation




P6. In acute





![$[CA]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/5/c/45c1acd47628de406680d04c09fe6314c3847acf.png)
![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)






Proof. From








P7 (E. Vargas Diaz). Semicircle

![$[AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/9/3/0936990e6625d65357ca51006c08c9fe3e04ba0c.png)



![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
are interior to












Proof 1 (synthetic). Denote radical centers








Remark.


.









Proof 2 (metric). Observe that















Apply Menelaus' theorem to






Thus,





















![$4x^2y^2=xy\left[(x+y)^2-(x-y)^2\right]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/6/8/e68bce98bf109b15948e4c624de207289e8fc1aa.png)



P8 (Cristian Tello). Let the circle

![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)

to the circle






Proof. Let the diameter
![$[TS]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/d/1/7d1c56878201dcd8cb25370c8fdf7b474c116cc3.png)




Lemma. Let




![$[LAB]+[LCD]=k$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/8/f/48f15fae3f30510143c76af079892310694bba2c.png)
Particular cases.





![$[AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/9/3/0936990e6625d65357ca51006c08c9fe3e04ba0c.png)
![$[BD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/2/6/3261e689901bce018ecdef47b9bc60a78ead3746.png)
![$[EF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/6/3/763239c0ce4fccc63411d3d6cb0011f7f6cc3a31.png)






Application. Let the tangential



![$[BD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/2/6/3261e689901bce018ecdef47b9bc60a78ead3746.png)

![$2\cdot [EBC]=[ABCD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/2/9/5292f81a6036d00511ac2ddff6f0fd81580ef850.png)
P9. Let





Proof. Let







that
















since















that






P10. Let



![$ \{P,Q\}\subset [BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/6/3/463886a21314527c940bf4fcb1f923d411fcad97.png)



of







Proof. Using the power of a point w.r.t. a circle obtain :









Remarks. If





identity is equivalently with the relation



























again the circumcircle of


















P11 (E. Vargas Diaz). Let a convex


![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)


Proof.


Aubel's relation to












An easy extension. Let a convex




denote



Proof 1. Let















Remark. Get analogously



Proof 2 (Suli). Let the circumcircles of











P12. Let


![$D\in [AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/5/a/c5acd77baad8d15d98170c2ac60f572eeeed5507.png)



sides in
![$K\in [AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/7/c/f7c55ea4f0642b6ee4395cbe8c000c6fec53e3ef.png)
![$L\in [AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/4/5/c45e50a5a8063a6607d6afd834b15cea829eb243.png)




Proof.. The incircle









Thus,




property






















P13 (M. O. Sanchez). Let an equilateral









arcs











Proof. Is well-known the Pompeiu's theorem





and the points












Remark. Apply the Pascal's theorem to the cyclical hexagon

P14 (Thanasis Gakopoulos, Greece). Prove that


Proof 1. Observe that






where is well known that











In conclusion,





Proof 2.







P15 (Thanasis Gakopoulos, Greece). Prove that


Proof. Have from the upper problem





On other hand,





This post has been edited 353 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Jan 27, 2018, 4:33 PM