169. Some metrical problems in a circle (III).
by Virgil Nicula, Oct 28, 2010, 10:59 AM
PP1. Let
with
circumcircle
; feet
,
of bisectors from
,
;
. Prove that
(Bulgaria, 1997) .
Generalization. Let
with the circumcircle
, two points
,
and a point
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (synthetic). Denote
so that
separates
,
. Apply the Ptolemy's theorem to
.
From an well-known property applied in the quadrilaterals
and
obtain
and
.
Therefore,
.
Proof 2 (trigonometric). Choose the point
so that the line
separates
,
. Denote
. Then
. Observe that
and
and the relation from conclusion is equivalently with



, what is truly.
Remarks. Denote
. Here are some interesting particular cases.
.
(Bulgaria, 1997).
.
(Nagel's point)
, where
.
(Lemoine's point)
.
Remark. Let
be a triangle with the circumcircle
. Denote the feet
,
of the bisectors from
,
respectively and
.
If the side
separates the points
and
then
and
and
PP2. Consider an interior point
of
for which
and
. Suppose
and denote the incenters
and 
for incircles of
and
respectively and the length
of circumradius of
. Prove that
(Toshio Seimyia).
Proof. Show easily that
. Observe that
and
.
Therefore,
. Apply the Cosinus' theorem in the triangles

. Therefore,
. Observe that
. Prove easily that
. Thus,


.
PP3. Let
. For
let the incircles
and
of
and 
respectively. Prove that
(Toshio Seimyia).
Proof. Denote
and
. Therefore,
is cyclically
and
. Hence
and
. Denote the distancies
and
. Thus,
and

. Remark. Let
and
. From the well-known relations
obtain that
.
PP4. Let an
-right
with the excircles
,
and
so that
,
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
so that
. Prove easily that the nice identity
. Therefore,
and

Thus,
and


. Remark.
is a harmonic division, i.e.
.
Hence and
is a harmonic division. Since
obtain that
is bisector of
.
PP5 (Miguel O. Sanchez). Let an
-right
and
. Prove that
.
Proof.
.
.
PP6 (Ruben Dario). Let
with
and
so that
and
. Let the incircles
and
of
and
respectively, where
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
. Observe that
.
Thus,

. Observe that
.
Thus,

. From
obtain that
and
.
Therefore,



Remark. I used the well-known relations in any
.









Generalization. Let






Proof 1 (synthetic). Denote





From an well-known property applied in the quadrilaterals




Therefore,



Proof 2 (trigonometric). Choose the point

























Remarks. Denote









Remark. Let







If the side







PP2. Consider an interior point







for incircles of





Proof. Show easily that



Therefore,


























PP3. Let






respectively. Prove that

Proof. Denote





















![$\frac {[ABD]}{cr_1}=\frac {[ADC]}{br_2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/3/1/c31227033cfc2ec3f683b3fd824deb6647589243.png)










PP4. Let an








Proof. Denote










![$\left(1+k^2\right)\left[(s-b)^2+(s-c)^2\right]\ \stackrel{(*)}{=}\ \frac {a^2+(b+c)^2}{a^2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/f/8/4f898227bab9fec46d29c14e120a47408690939c.png)









Hence and




PP5 (Miguel O. Sanchez). Let an




Proof.












PP6 (Ruben Dario). Let












Proof. Denote




Thus,







Thus,









Therefore,



![$\frac {bc(s-a)}{a}\left[\frac {(s-a)+(s-b)}{s-b}+\frac {(s-a)+(s-c)}{s-c}-2\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/3/7/c37fd19c3f3a17b2a20a5f3e6036aa5bc84e2168.png)






Remark. I used the well-known relations in any

This post has been edited 113 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Dec 1, 2015, 9:27 AM