371. Some problems from NMO (final stage) - 2013, Romania.
by Virgil Nicula, Apr 8, 2013, 12:29 AM
Lemma 1. Let
for which the projection
of
on
belongs to the side
. Then
.
Proof. Apply the generalized Pythagoras' relation
. Otherwise. 
.
Can show shorter with trigonometry (the Cosinus' theorem). Indeed,
.
Remark. Using relation
can obtain Heron's formula. Indeed,

.
Remark. Let
be a diameter of the circumcircle
. Thus,

. in conclusion,
. Hence
.
PP1 (grade 7 - modified enunciation). Let an
-right
with
. Denote
so that
,
and
. Prove that
and in this case find the ratios
and
.
Proof 1. Show easily that
and
. Apply the upper lemma: 
. Obtain analogously that
.
Method 1.1. I"ll use the property
. Hence

. Using substitution
, relation
becomes

Method 1.2. Denote
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversals
in the triangles
respectively:
.
.
Therefore,
.
Suppose that
. In this case
. Apply the property
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to
and
. Thus,
.
I"ll show that
. Indeed, apply the Menelaus' theorem to

. Therefore,
. See here.
Proof 2 (analytic). Let
. Thus,
. So 

Lemma 2. Let
and
. Then there is the relation
.
Proof 3.. Let
. Thus,
,
are cyclic, i.e.
and
. Apply
lemma 2 and get
. I"ll use method 1.1
.
PP2 (grade 7). Let
with
and
and
so that
. Prove that
.
Proof.
belong to the
-median
.Thus,
. Hence
. This problem is very easy.
PP3 (grade 8). Ascertain
and
so that
.
Proof. Show easily that
. Hence
, i.e.
. Denote
, where
and
. Thus, the equation becomes
. Hence
, i.e.
and
. Thus,
, i.e.
and
. From
obtain that
.
Since
and
obtain that
and
and
.
PP4 (grade 9). Let an interior point
of
for which denote
. and the radius-length
of the incircle for
. Prove that
and
.
Proof. Show easily that
, where

. It is well-known or show easily that
and the perimeter of
is at least equally to the
perimeter
of the orthic triangle for
. Thus,
.




![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)

Proof. Apply the generalized Pythagoras' relation








Can show shorter with trigonometry (the Cosinus' theorem). Indeed,


Remark. Using relation






![$\left[2ac+\left(a^2+c^2-b^2\right)\right]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/3/9/5398d45be7c21ab05a2b188797f95d8c004857ce.png)
![$\left[2ac-\left(a^2+c^2-b^2\right)\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/f/d/bfdfc4fc848dbcc5988195755ed76fe41571f51a.png)
![$\left[(a+c)^2-b^2\right]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/d/f/edf1e55b53d83284d19bbabdf0b8835e1f45ea95.png)
![$\left[b^2-(a-c)^2\right]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/a/0/5a0ddbd333ec541f42121e09b0bbc495b1319979.png)

Remark. Let
![$[AL]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/3/7/737a9b49658cbe239832952bb575c8bbdf7dbb35.png)











PP1 (grade 7 - modified enunciation). Let an










Proof 1. Show easily that










Method 1.1. I"ll use the property











Method 1.2. Denote















Therefore,







Suppose that














I"ll show that











Proof 2 (analytic). Let








Lemma 2. Let



Proof 3.. Let






lemma 2 and get





PP2 (grade 7). Let






Proof.








PP3 (grade 8). Ascertain


![$[x] +\left\{\frac 1x\right\}=1.005\cdot n$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/8/a/98a5c72fe761f445af22b5a25ef0d6591f6fc18a.png)
Proof. Show easily that






![$[x] +\left\{\frac 1x\right\}=\left(1+\frac 1{200}\right)\cdot n\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/1/7/1174fac7d1204b66f0ce59275aa8574fda4fff80.png)
![$[x] +\left\{\frac 1x\right\}=n+q+\frac r{200}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/f/5/bf50fb40eec6e67a0ce50f5807f9531a71859077.png)
![$[x]=n+q$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/c/a/8cadaca3761d3b8d94d27352827834251b79211b.png)
![$[x]=201q+r$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/b/b/4bb540e825b667fb493a8ba8e5412ff726f8307a.png)




![$[x]\le x<[x]+1$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/8/8/c88cb23bfa4209b9fd8de2b154a3c5402ea5d268.png)


Since






PP4 (grade 9). Let an interior point





![$[DEF]\le \frac S4$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/5/e/65ee17f34b37af3b87ba240cb12f33350a66b3b6.png)

Proof. Show easily that



![$[DEF]=\frac {2S}{(x+1)(y+1)(z+1)}\le$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/a/e/daeab7f5d64d3807059fc4096fe4ee360407b898.png)


![$\boxed{[DEF]\le\frac S4}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/9/2/7922bf6d1739207f2739a9a93e4ac1869d173172.png)
![$\left\{\begin{array}{c}
S=[ABC]=2R^2\sin A\sin B\sin C\\\\
s_{\mathrm{orth}}=2R\sin A\sin B\sin C\end{array}\right|$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/2/4/0249ecb7dd7fb4e30fb4a0110bc3169cece5206c.png)

perimeter


![$\rho =\frac {[DEF]}{s_{DEF}}\le$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/b/e/3be22dcfb0f04c4840b1274742e6f0cfffbff5f2.png)



This post has been edited 85 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Nov 15, 2015, 3:20 PM