389. Some geometric properties in a triangle I.
by Virgil Nicula, Nov 9, 2013, 9:19 AM
PP1. Let a
-rightangled
with
and
. For a mobile
define
so that
. Finf the range of
.
Proof. Denote
and
. Prove easily that
. Apply the theorem of Sines in 
. Thus, 

. Thus,
with equality iff 
. In conclusion,
.
Remark. I used only the inequality
with equality iff
.
PP2. Let an acute
with the orthic
, where
,
,
. Let the midpoint
of
, the projection
of
the orthocenter
on
and the
-bisector
of
, where
. Prove that
and
.
Proof.
.
.
Thus,
, i.e.
is the
-bisector of
.
PP3.
and
exists relation
. Find
where 
Proof.
![$R\left[2\sin x\sin\frac x2+\cos\frac x2\left(\sum\cos A-1\right)+\sin\frac x2\cdot\sum\sin A\right]=$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/e/c/cec3cc739d86543d041287581f9a7fc3223a0071.png)

.
Remark.
. For
obtain
.
, i.e.
. Example.

PP4. Solve the equation
in
. See here
PP5. Let
,
with
, circle
which is interior tangent to
in
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. From an well-known property obtain that the rays
and
are
-bisectors of
and
respectively. Thus,
and 
.
Let
, i.e.
. Therefore,

,
Remark. Observe that
and
are cyclically. Thus,
, i.e. the ray
is the bisector of
(Julio Orihuela's proof).
PP6. Let
with incenter
which touches the
at
,
,
. Let the midpoint
of
. Prove that
.
Proof.

and
. In conclusion,
.
PP7. Let
and for
,
denote
. Prove that
is tangential
Proof. Let the incircle
of
and
. Thus,

and
.
PP8. Let a convex
for which
,
and exists circle
what is tangent to
,
,
,
. Prove that
.
Proof. Let
. Thus,

and
.
PP9. Let
with
. Prove that
.
Proof. Is evidently that
. Suppose
and let
.
From
obtain
and

.
PP10. Let
with
. Find
and ascertain
(standard notations).
Proof 1. I"ll use some remarkable properties of
, where
is the Nagel's point w.r.t.
. Is well-known that
with
, i.e.
is a trapezoid and
and
. Let
, where
and apply
the generalized Pythagoras' theorem to the mentioned corresponding sides/triangles

. Remark that
and
.
Proof 2 (Israel Diaz, Peru). Denote the Euler's circle
w.r.t.
and
. From the Euler's relation
obtain that
. Thus,
and
. From the Feuerbach's theorem (the incircle is interior tangent to the Euler's circle) obtain that
, i.e.
. Hence the relations
. Apply the Stewart's relation to :


Using the relation
obtain that
.
PP11. The incircle
of
touches it at
,
,
. Suppose that circumcenter of
belongs to circumcircle of
. Prove 
Proof. Denote the circumcenter
of
and suppose w.l.o.g.
,
separates
,
and
. Is well-known that
.
Prove easily that
(s.s.a. - obtuse) , i.e.
and
. Apply Stewart's relation
to
.
Apply the Stewart's relation to
in
![$ad^2+a(s-b)(s-c)=l^2[(s-b)+(s-c)]\implies$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/1/a/d1a2cf55671afec48755af8cd7c4bc685b131189.png)
. From
get
, i.e.
.
PP12 (Julio Orihuela, Peru). Let
with the circumcircle
. Consider
and
so that 
and
. Let
so that
and
doesn't separate
,
and
. Prove that
.
Proof.

and
. Hence from
obtain that
is
-bisector of
and
.
PP13. Let
with the orthocenter
. Denote
and
. Prove that
.
Proof.
Denote the orthic triangle
, where
,
and
. Observe that
and
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversal 
and
, i.e. the division
is harmonically and
.
Denote
. Apply a well-known property (or you can prove easily it) of a harmonical division
. Therefore,
is a cyclical quadrilateral
. See PP1 from here.
PP14. Prove that
(Carlos Olivera & Ruben Auqui, PERU).

Proof. Denote
so that
the incircle
of
. Observe that
and
. Therefore,
.
Hence
. On other hand

. Using the relations
and
obtain easily that 
, what is truly.
PP15 (Stan Fulger's lemma). Let the circle
and
so that
. For a point
so that
doesn't
separate
and
denote its projections
on
,
,
respectively. Prove that
.
Proof. Thus,
.
Application 1.
-excircle
touches
at
, where
. Let the distance
. Define analogously the distancies
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Appy the upper lemma and obtain that

. In conclusion,
.
Proof 2. Suppose w.l.o.g. that
and
. Prove easily that
and
. Thus
and
and 
a.s.o. Obtain quickly that
using the well-known identities
and
.
Application 2. Let
be a triangle with the incircle
and the
-excircle
. The circle
touches
at 
and the
-excircle touches
at
. Denote the areas
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Prove easily that
and
. Therefore, using the identities from
obtain that
.
Remark. Can use the Stan Fulger's lemma. Denote the projections
,
and
of
on
,
and
respectively. Thus,

and
.
Otherwise. Denote the diameter
of
. Is well-known
and prove easily that
,
,
, i.e.
the triangles
and
are homothetically with the vertex
and the ratio
. Therefore,
, where
a.s.o.
Proof 2. I"ll use the relation
, where
is the area of
. Thus,
and
. Hence:

In conclusion,
.
PP16 (O.M. IberoAm., 2014). Let an acute
with the orthocenter
and the orthic
, where
.
Denote
. Prove that
is cyclically.
Proof. Apply the Menelaus theorem to the mentioned transversals/triangles
and
are isosceles trapezoids because
and
respectively. Since
is cyclically.
PP17. Let
and
and the bisectors
of
respectively,
where
. Prove that
.
Proof.
. Apply Stewart's to
.
Therefore,

.
PP18. Let parallelogram
with
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. Let
. Apply the generalized Pytagoras' theorem to
the relation
.
PP19. Let the circle
,
and the midpoint
of the small arc
. Prove that
have
.
Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.
and let
so that
. Apply the Ptolemy's theorem to the isosceles trapezoid 
. Since
obtain that
.
PP20. Aratati ca in
exista echivalenta

Demonstratie 1.
are solutiile
Asadar,

Intr-adevar,
si
si

Se arata usor ca
Discriminantul in raport cu
este 
si singura radacina pozitiva este
Asadar

Demonstratie 2. Si acum o solutie foarte simpla pentru problema propusa la nivelul clasei a VII - a !

Se observa ca
Iata o problema similara
Gasiti
o extindere pastrand expresia
Observatie.
unde am notat
Deci,

Extindere.
Demonstratie. Se observa ca






![$M\in [AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/b/1/7b1a07ab551be77c55343ddd04e6923c5592b7ab.png)
![$P\in [BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/8/7/087dcfc6e817021079bdd2436e980d096613bc7a.png)


Proof. Denote










![$\frac 32\left[\cos \left(2x+30^{\circ}\right)+\cos 30^{\circ}\right]+$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/9/3/193be3e99339b6f7da8884eabba102efed202e8a.png)
![$2\left[\sin\left (2x+30^{\circ} \right)-\sin 30^{\circ}\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/3/3/433b826352ed99a1f6cf8b9aefe592d1aaea4c49.png)
![$\left(\frac {3\sqrt 3}{4}-1\right)+\frac 12\left[3\cos \left(2x+30^{\circ}\right)+4\sin \left(2x+30^{\circ}\right)\right]\le$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/0/6/7066aaebc6a236a15cc837bc1b4ca6492951d400.png)








Remark. I used only the inequality


PP2. Let an acute






![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)

the orthocenter








Proof.










Thus,









PP3.





Proof.


![$R\left[2\sin x\sin\frac x2+\cos\frac x2\left(\sum\cos A-1\right)+\sin\frac x2\cdot\sum\sin A\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/e/c/cec3cc739d86543d041287581f9a7fc3223a0071.png)
![$R\left[2\sin x\sin\frac x2-\cos \frac x2+\cos \left(A-\frac x2\right)+\cos\left(B-\frac x2\right)+\cos\left(C-\frac x2\right)\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/2/2/5222a2f2d310986a15e6e49a2807982d09d2924f.png)




Remark.








PP4. Solve the equation


PP5. Let








Proof. From an well-known property obtain that the rays
















Let












Remark. Observe that






PP6. Let







![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)

Proof.




and







PP7. Let






Proof. Let the incircle














PP8. Let a convex









Proof. Let














PP9. Let


![$[BDM]=[CEN]\iff AB=AC$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/8/1/c81f809e83e9491292d1bf7367a2d84e4cedacd0.png)
Proof. Is evidently that
![$AB=AC\implies [BDM]=[CEN]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/9/3/e93791c511cd5653cb05a32e98cd151f278ccfe6.png)
![$[BDM]=[CEN]=x$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/b/9/1b9fba31a63d423a8a1322ed1eb5866b0ee1e885.png)

From
![$\frac {x+u}{x+v}=\frac {[ABM]}{[ACN]}=\frac {BM}{CN}=\frac mn$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/f/7/ff7f40714065ba535c18c7e8439a9f3545e84c27.png)





![$(m-n)[2mn+a(m+n)]=0\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/7/a/37a0a87f12c4e9834501fa732fd72c1e16423888.png)

PP10. Let




Proof 1. I"ll use some remarkable properties of











the generalized Pythagoras' theorem to the mentioned corresponding sides/triangles







Proof 2 (Israel Diaz, Peru). Denote the Euler's circle


















Using the relation




PP11. The incircle








Proof. Denote the circumcenter








Prove easily that




to




Apply the Stewart's relation to


![$ad^2+a(s-b)(s-c)=l^2[(s-b)+(s-c)]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/1/a/d1a2cf55671afec48755af8cd7c4bc685b131189.png)






PP12 (Julio Orihuela, Peru). Let














Proof.














PP13. Let





Proof.








and

















PP14. Prove that


Proof. Denote











Hence














PP15 (Stan Fulger's lemma). Let the circle





separate







Proof. Thus,





Application 1.









Proof 1. Appy the upper lemma and obtain that










Proof 2. Suppose w.l.o.g. that












Application 2. Let











![$S=[DEF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/c/d/bcd97a7380624fb73fbef9040305e12cbe3a28db.png)
![$S'=[D'E'F']$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/2/1/021ccb17f6887ec779b36cc974968355b620c16d.png)

Proof 1. Prove easily that





Remark. Can use the Stan Fulger's lemma. Denote the projections









and

![$S'=[E'D'F']=s\sin\frac A2\cdot\sqrt{(s-b)(s-c)\sin B\sin C}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/9/3/a934e07cec37411fdb6c72d834ed2ad2e9b796c2.png)


Otherwise. Denote the diameter
![$[DS]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/3/e/d3edda0cd1b9b44cc8c2bfe6b4cc240f712aaf9f.png)





the triangles




![$S'=\left(\frac s{s-a}\right)^2\cdot [SEF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/9/0f968269df5ee6664ac09865191a1e131a53f50e.png)
![$[SEF]=2r^2\sin\frac C2\sin\frac B2\cos\frac A2=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/f/4/df413249991c515a0bcfcd215ac95537cc5d943e.png)


Proof 2. I"ll use the relation











In conclusion,


PP16 (O.M. IberoAm., 2014). Let an acute




Denote


Proof. Apply the Menelaus theorem to the mentioned transversals/triangles










PP17. Let




where


Proof.



Therefore,







PP18. Let parallelogram




Proof. Let




PP19. Let the circle



![$\overarc[]{AB}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/d/7/7d78b2263c122b211ec9a6ebd0a804354ec087b6.png)
![$(\forall )\ P\in \overarc[]{AB}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/7/7/b779ec50af49132e538700f866d8c048d4997405.png)

Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.
![$P\in\overarc[]{MB}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/0/3/30328124fc3d98b4ec5b37375e21dfc275f94424.png)
![$R\in \overarc[]{MA}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/6/4/1643de826691d509d786eb1cf16223384ecb5687.png)





PP20. Aratati ca in



Demonstratie 1.





















si singura radacina pozitiva este






Demonstratie 2. Si acum o solutie foarte simpla pentru problema propusa la nivelul clasei a VII - a !





![$A\in\left(\ 0\ ,\ \frac {\pi}{6}\ \right]\ \Longrightarrow\ b^2+c^2\ \ge\ a^2+4S\sqrt 3\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/f/4/cf436b07b6eb2902089f0f5a4b7fa06b3f2abfe5.png)

o extindere pastrand expresia









Extindere.

Demonstratie. Se observa ca







This post has been edited 349 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, May 30, 2016, 10:28 PM