320. Some problems with metrical relations.
by Virgil Nicula, Oct 1, 2011, 12:44 PM
PP1. Let
be an
-isoceles triangle. For a mobile point
so that
, denote the length 
of the inradius of
and the length
of the
-exradius of
. Prove that the sum
is constant.
Proof 1 (metric).
.
Denote
. I"ll show that
. Therefore,


, i.e. the relation
.
Remark 1 . If
is the length of the inradius of
and
is the length of the
-exinradius of
, then also
because the relation
and the proof of the equivalence is symmetrically in the vertices
and
.
Remark 2 . Can prove otherwise the relation
. Denote the second intersection
of
with the circumcircle of
and
so that
.
Observe that
, i.e.
, what means that the line
is tangent to the circumcircle of 
, i.e. the relation
.
Proof 2. Let
be the incircle and
the excircle and let
intersect the line parallel to
which passes through
in
. It can be easily seen that the angle formed
by the lines
and
is constant and is equal to the angle
. Consider the rotation with center
and angle
so that
goes to
and it is possible since
is isosceles with vertex
. Now, triangle
will go to triangle
and so the inradius of
is equal to the inradius of
and so the length of 
can be added to
to get the length between the line parallel to
and passing through
and
which is the result claimed.
PP2. Let
be two by two secant circles. Denote
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote the radical center
of the given circles. Thus,
.
PP3. Let
be a convex quadrilateral. Prove that the set of the points
so that
.
Proof
so that
.
If
, then
. Suppose that
and denote
. In this case
the given relations becomes

PP4. Let
be a triangle with inradius
and let
and
be two circles so
that
,
are tangent to
and
,
are tangent to
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
so that
and
and
,
. Observe that 
.
PP5. Find all points
in a plane such that
, where
and
are two given points.
Proof. Define the point
so that
and
. Denote
and apply the Stewart's relation to the cevian
and
. Therefore, 
(constant). In conclusion, since the point
is fixed and
is constant the required points
belong to the circle
.
Generalization. Find all points
in a plane such that
(constant), where
and
are two given points and
,
.
Proof. Denote
. Suppose w.l.o.g. that
and exist only two cases :
The first case :
. Denote
so that
and apply the Stewart's relation to the cevian
and 
. Therefore,
. Since the point
is fixed and
is constant obtain in this case that the point
belongs to the circle
, where
, i.e.
.
The second case :
. Denote
so that
and apply the Stewart's relation to
the cevian
and
. Therefore, 
. Since the point
is fixed and
is constant obtain in this case that the point
belongs to the circle
,
where
, i.e.
.
PP6. Let
and
be the circles through
and which touch
at
respectively. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
and
. Observe that
and
. Therefore,
. Remark that
and
. Thus,
.
Remark. Let
be the centers of the circumcircle and the circles
m
. Prove easily that
.
PP7. Let
and
be angle bisectors in
. It's also given an arbitrary point 
and the distancies
between
and
,
,
respectively. Prove that
.
Proof. Prove easily that
. Thus, ![$[EAF]=[MAE]+[MAF]\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/8/4/084b6e798b8112b07e522b96ed9d275a541f8cb0.png)
, where ![$S=[ABC]=$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/3/9/739e40c454123818abc091496f171708ba947818.png)
is the area of
. In conclusion,
.
PP8. Let
be a triangle with
. Denote the orthocenter
of
, the midpoint
of the side
and the
projection
of
on
. Prove that the line
is a common tangent to the circumcircles of
,
and
.
Proof. Denote
so that
. Observe that
is cyclical quadrilateral, i.e.
. Thus,

. Thus,
is a common tangent to circumcircles of
,
and
.
Generalization (Petrisor Neagoe). Let
be a triangle. A circle
through the points
,
intersects
,
at
,
respectively.
Denote
and
,
. Prove that
is tangent to the circumcircles of
and
.
Proof. Denote
. Observe that
is the polar of
w.r.t.
and
is the polar of
w.r.t.
.
Therefore,
is the orthocenter of
. So,
. Denote
. Thus, 
and
is tangent to the circumcircle of
and
is
tangent to the circumcircle of
. On other hand,
.
Similarly
. The relations
and
.
PP9. Let
be a triangle with the incircle
. Denote the inradii 
of
respectively. Prove that
.
Proof.
.
PP10. Let
be a triangle with
and
. Find
.
Proof. I"ll use the remarkable identity
, i.e.


. Answer :
.
Remark.
. Analogously
.
PP11. Two circles with radii
and
are placed so that they are tangent to each other and a straight line. A third circle
is nestled between them so that it is tangent to the first two circles and the line. Find the radius
of the third circle.
Proof.

Remark. Generally, if three circles
are exterior tangent to each other, then the radius
of
the circle
which is nestled between them so that is tangent to the first three circles is given by the relation
. For
obtain upper relation
, i.e.
.
PP12. Let
be an equilateral with sidelength
. We draw a semicircle with the diameter
outside of triangle. A line
is tangent
to the semicircle such that the distance from
to
is
. Compute the distancies
from the remaining vertices
to the line
.
Proof. Denote : the midpoint
of
; the point
and suppose w.l.o.g. that
;
so that
;
so that
;
. Observe that
and
, i.e.
. Thus,
.
Compatibility test :
.
PP13. Let
be a rectangle with
and
. Consider the points
,
,
,
so that
is a rectangle and
. Calculate
.
Proof.
.
Thus,
and
.
Remark.
.
PP14. Let
so that
. Consider
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
so that
. Hence
and is evidently
and 
. Denote
. Thus, on the one hand

and on the other hand
![$\frac {\cos\left[\left(\alpha -C\right)+x\right]}{\sin (\alpha -C)}\cdot\frac {1}{\sin x}\implies$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/3/1/f315d098f0d0626321ead58c1f1239a4f4f7b11d.png)
, i.e.
.
Observe that
. Therefore, the relation
becomes
.
PP15. Let
and the points
,
,
,
. Denote
,
,
,
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. I"ll use an well-known property
. Therefore,

, what is truly.
Remark. Denote
and
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversal
and
:
.
Thus, the relation
becomes
. In the particular case
when
, the previous relation becomes
.
In this case it is well-known the relation
- a characterization of the harmonical division
. Thus, the proposed problem is a generalization of the well-known relation
.
Remark. If
, then the relation
is truly. If
, then suppose w.l.o.g. that
so that
. For
denote
. Observe that

, what is truly.
Proof 2 (with areas). Denote
. Therefore,
.
.
.
Hence

.
PP16. Let
be a circle with the diameter
. Let
be a fixed point Denote the tangent line
at
to the circle
. For a mobile chord
so that
denote
and
. Prove that the product
is constant, regardless of the choice of chord
.
Proof. Denote
(constant). It's well-known or can show easily the relation
.
Method 1 (synthetic).
(constant).
Method 2 (trigonometric).
.
Remark. Since
obtain that the quadrilateral
is cyclically. Here is an inversion with pole
and modulus
, i.e.
.
Since
is constant, then
is minimum
, i.e.
.
PP17. Let
,
be two fixed points on a given circle
. Denote
, where
is the tangent at
to the circle
.
For a mobile point
denote its projections
,
,
on
,
,
respectively. Prove that
.
Proof. The quadrilateral
is inscribed in the circle with the diameter
and the quadrilateral
is inscribed in the circle with the diameter
. Therefore,
.
Denote
. Observe that
the ray
is the
-angled bisector of
.
From the relations
obtain that
, i.e. the ray
is the
-symmedian of the triangle
.
PP18. Let
-right
. Denote the foot
of the
-angled bisector. Suppose that
and
. Find
.
Proof 1 (trigonometric - similar with DoctorB's). Denote the projection
of
on
,
and
. Observe that
. Therefore, 
and
. Thus,
.
Proof 2 (metric). Let
. Thus

.
Proof 3 (metric). Denote
. Prove easily that
.
PP19. Let
with
, altitude
, incenter
, the projection
of
on
and
such that
. Show that
is the incenter of
.
Proof (Sunken Rock). Let incircle touch
at
. As constructed,
is a rhombus. Hence
and
is the orthocenter of
. Let
be altitudes of
-isosceles
. To prove
that
is the incenter of
we need to prove that
and
are homologue points into triangles
,
or
. But this is obvious, since
. Nice problem and its proof !
PP20. Let a rectangle
and the midpoints
,
of
,
respectively. Prove
.
Proof 1.
.
Proof 2. Let
and
. Thus,
.
Proof 3. Denote
and
so that
. Thus,
.
Proof 4. Let
and
so that
. Thus, the quadrilaterals
,
are cyclically and
is the radical axis of their
circumcircles. Therefore,
.
Proof 5. Let
,
,
and
, where
,
. Thus,
,
and the slopes
.
In conclusion,
.
An easy extension. Let
be an isosceles trapezoid so that
. Let
,
so that
and
. Prove
.
Proof.
.
PP21 (worthhawholebean). Let
. Suppose that exist
so that
and
,
so that
,
,
form a geometric progression and
,
,
form an arithmetic progression. Prove that
is the midpoint of
.
Proof. Denote
. Thus,
. Observe that

. Therefore,

. In conclusion,
and
.
PP22 (NMO - Bulgaria, 1997). Let
with the circumcircle
and
,
,
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote
. Apply an well-known relations
. Therefore, 
, what is truly.
Proof 2 (synthetic). Apply the Ptolemy's relation in the cyclical quadrilateral
, where
and the well-known relations
. Thus,
what is truly from
.
PP23. Let
with the centroid
. Let midpoint
of
,
,
so that
and
,
so that
. Prove that
.
Proof.
.
I"ll use an well-known property
. Therefore,
.
An easy extension. For an interior point
of
denote
, two points
so that
and
,
so that
. Prove that
.
Proof.
. Thus,

.
I"ll use an well-known property
. Therefore, 
. Particular case. If
(incentre), then
and there are the relations
.
===================================================================================================================================================
I"ll prove the remarkable relation
. Denote
so that
and
. Therefore, 
.
Therefore,
.
PP24.
tangent to
,
tangent to
,
tangent to
,
,
. Prove that there is the relation
.
Proof. Denote the points
,
,
so that
,
,
and
. Prove easily that
,
. Thus,
,
and 
. In conclusion,
.





of the inradius of





Proof 1 (metric).




Denote











Remark 1 . If









Remark 2 . Can prove otherwise the relation






Observe that













Proof 2. Let






by the lines














can be added to




PP2. Let



Proof. Denote the radical center


PP3. Let




Proof



If




the given relations becomes


PP4. Let




that
![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
![$[BA]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/c/c/2cc5508c130989c8fbbfe37a59f488dba36eca75.png)

![$[CB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/0/a/f0a45a13c6123c357e7ffe7d05e50e68ad7d157a.png)
![$[CA]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/5/c/45c1acd47628de406680d04c09fe6314c3847acf.png)


Proof. Denote
![$\left\{P_1,P_2\right\}\subset [BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/3/9/339d7bec385ddfa3d75535253a698a2367d049e9.png)











PP5. Find all points




Proof. Define the point















Generalization. Find all points






Proof. Denote























the cevian








where




PP6. Let






Proof. Denote












Remark. Let




PP7. Let




and the distancies






Proof. Prove easily that

![$[EAF]=[MAE]+[MAF]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/8/4/084b6e798b8112b07e522b96ed9d275a541f8cb0.png)


![$S=[ABC]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/3/9/739e40c454123818abc091496f171708ba947818.png)



PP8. Let





![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
projection







Proof. Denote

















Generalization (Petrisor Neagoe). Let








Denote






Proof. Denote







Therefore,






and






tangent to the circumcircle of


Similarly



PP9. Let



of


Proof.

![$\sum\frac {2\cdot [BIC]}{r_1}=\sum\frac {ar}{r_1}\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/3/6/2364faa088c643b469c24e608c31438597032bf8.png)

PP10. Let




Proof. I"ll use the remarkable identity










Remark.



PP11. Two circles with radii


is nestled between them so that it is tangent to the first two circles and the line. Find the radius

Proof.
![$\left[2\left(\sqrt {rr_1}+\sqrt{rr_2}\right)\right]^2+\left(r_1-r_2\right)^2=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/d/9/8d973d59e2a02d8763c64b7cdaeaab5c7a3a183a.png)



Remark. Generally, if three circles


the circle








PP12. Let




to the semicircle such that the distance from






Proof. Denote : the midpoint

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)













Compatibility test :

PP13. Let



![$X\in [AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/4/4/544041620b7f0c436bf1833abcd73e84461fdc6c.png)
![$Y\in [BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/8/7/3877526903f262f6d0cd2ecb8803c7f935fa06e7.png)
![$Z\in [CD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/5/c/d5c4d1051306c9cd838ebaf3b7cc8bc05a98fc88.png)
![$T\in [DA]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/b/a/dbac9b4624d26c12430f70d520eceb2e16ea365c.png)



Proof.


Thus,




Remark.



PP14. Let




Proof. Denote










and on the other hand


![$\frac {\cos\left[\left(\alpha -C\right)+x\right]}{\sin (\alpha -C)}\cdot\frac {1}{\sin x}\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/3/1/f315d098f0d0626321ead58c1f1239a4f4f7b11d.png)



Observe that










PP15. Let










Proof 1. I"ll use an well-known property






Remark. Denote





Thus, the relation





In this case it is well-known the relation



















Proof 2 (with areas). Denote
![$S=[ABC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/3/a/b3ae3d445111e4dd28be75922309d3270079368c.png)
![$\frac {[AMP]}{S}=\frac {[AMP]}{[ABC]}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/5/e/35e38709133c7a3d6d8f1388d20fe59db8456668.png)



![$ [AMP]=\frac {x\cdot S}{(x+1)(z+1)}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/8/1/28195dd87731103558fdd31a89ca661a3c9d9aea.png)
![$\blacktriangleright\ \frac {[AOM]}{S}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/1/d/11da960204fa5e6435876ac787b2266bff07cedb.png)
![$\frac {[AOM}{[ABN]}\cdot \frac {[ABN]}{[ABC]}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/8/1/681a479fcd740623a2ded28b934b58fc3e577677.png)



![$ [AOM]=\frac {xyt\cdot S}{(x+1)(y+1)(t+1)}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/7/d/d7d6393ce8c5c2db7897a0aa8fed3d1a16a6790e.png)
![$\blacktriangleright\ \frac {[AOP]}{S}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/5/9/e59d22da0f65f1a4148f4e78cccbf07d69e36725.png)
![$\frac {[AOP]}{[ANC]}\cdot\frac {[ANC]}{[ABC]}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/0/5/805e8692495aede425a72720ee8eaf23aa4cc5ff.png)



![$[AOP]=\frac {t\cdot S}{(y+1)(z+1)(t+1)}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/1/7/8172c4eaf563242989f9f5a481ae436f495267c1.png)
Hence
![$[AOM]+[AOP]=[AMP]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/1/7/d1731b6d82096f5aeb354d838cbe84f82118c104.png)







PP16. Let

![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)










Proof. Denote



Method 1 (synthetic).

Method 2 (trigonometric).


Remark. Since





Since





PP17. Let







For a mobile point








Proof. The quadrilateral

![$[PA]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/e/b/9ebf20f36ee3e23713ec93c7735679c77ca69ad0.png)

![$[PB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/2/b/32b69bff37445b424d25083f8f3637fbff8fb6f9.png)







Denote









From the relations





PP18. Let







Proof 1 (trigonometric - similar with DoctorB's). Denote the projection















Proof 2 (metric). Let










Proof 3 (metric). Denote






PP19. Let











Proof (Sunken Rock). Let incircle touch









that








PP20. Let a rectangle



![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)
![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)

Proof 1.











Proof 2. Let







Proof 3. Denote










Proof 4. Let






circumcircles. Therefore,





Proof 5. Let









In conclusion,






An easy extension. Let







Proof.











PP21 (worthhawholebean). Let












![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
Proof. Denote
















PP22 (NMO - Bulgaria, 1997). Let






Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote






Proof 2 (synthetic). Apply the Ptolemy's relation in the cyclical quadrilateral








PP23. Let



![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)







Proof.








An easy extension. For an interior point









Proof.












===================================================================================================================================================











Therefore,




PP24.












Proof. Denote the points


















This post has been edited 216 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Nov 19, 2015, 9:44 PM