394. A cevian in a triangle and two incircles.
by Virgil Nicula, Apr 12, 2014, 1:13 AM
PP1. Let
with semiperimeter
and incircle
For
let the incircles
of
respectively. Prove that :
Prove easily that the relation

where
, with equality iff 
The circles
are tangent to the line
in the same point. In this case denote the middlepoints
of the side ![$[BC]\ ,$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/5/6/6563ca77d31eb676ef646fa9c37ea181b812d864.png)
the segment
respectively ; the point
for which
Prove easily that 
Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g. that
Denote : the tangent points
of the circles
with the line
respectively ; the tangent points
of the circles 
with the line
respectively ;
Prove easily that :
and
Thus,




Proof 1 (with derivatives). Let
or
Prove easily that
Let 
The relation
becomes
and the problem
i.e. 
Remark
Let
Prove easily that
Thus, for any
, where
Coming back to the initial problem get
i.e. ![$\boxed{\ \delta =\frac{r}{a}\cdot \left[ p-\sqrt{p(p-a)}\right]\ }\ .$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/3/5/2354e1652fbc38a7fb56d2bd2c225d7966fb9f37.png)
Proof 2 (without derivatives). Using the same notations from the previous proof obtain :
Thus,

and

because
We have equality iff
a.s.o.
Remark 1. In the case
add and another relations :

From the Stewart's theorem applying for
obtain 
Remark 2. In same case
. Let
. Thus,
![$\frac {r^2\left[p-\sqrt{p(p-a)}\right]}{(p-c)\left[ar-pr+r\sqrt{p(p-a)}\right]}=$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/1/8/418eef6fdcb1973c874c4e46f99bdee0ea3c6934.png)

. On other hand,
.
Proof 1. Using the above notations, the circles
are tangent in the same point to the line


Proof 2.
the triangle
is a degenerated circumscribed quadrilateral

(from a well-known property) the incircles of the triangles
are tangent in the same point of the "diagonal" 
![$\{r[(p-b)+(p-c)]-r_{1}(p-b)-$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/5/0/950e8ac7d65c3ca95fd760e14e857ebe7e98f1f6.png)

Otherwise.
,
i.e.
From the relations
and
obtain 
Denote the intersections
Prove easily that
,
,
, 
Apply the Menelaus's theorem to the transversals
.
From the relations
and
obtain
, i.e.
and
Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversal
in 
, i.e.
Remark 
Denote the tangent points
,
of the incircle
and the intersection
Thus,
i.e. 
Thus,

i.e.
The points
,
are conjugate
w.r.t.
Thus,
and
the ray
is the bisector of the angle
I hope for no mistakes in the my proof !
A similar identity. For the triangle
denote the length
of the
- altitude and the
- exincircle
For a point
denote the
-excircles
,
of the triangles
,
respectively. Prove that exists the identity
, which is equivalently with 
PP2. Let an equilateral
and for
denote the incircles
. Find the length of the side
.
Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.
. Denote
. Prove easily that
and 
. Observe that

. Obtain that

.
Particular case.
the length of the altitude is
.
PP3. Let
of
, and
and
be the incentres of
,
respectively. Suppose that
,
,
,
are concyclic. Prove that 
Proof. Let
and we put
. Thus,
. Since
is a cyclical quadrilateral,
giving
.
bisects
and
bisects

. Hence
. In
let the inradius, the altitude from
, the area be
,
,
respectively. In
let the
corresponding quantities be
,
,
. In
,
let the altitude from
be
,
respectively. Then
. Hence
. From
get 
. From
obtain
. Now
. So 
and similarly
. From
it follows
.
PP4. Let
with the circumcircle
and the bisector
, where
for which denote
.
Circle with the diameter
cuts
again at the point
. Prove that
is the
-symmedian of
.
Lemma. Let
with the circumcircle
. Denote the following points : the midpoint
of
; the point
for which
; the point
for which
; the
-symmedian
, where
; the point
for which
. Then
, i.e. the quadrilateral
is cyclically.
Proof. Denote
- the tangent in
to
. Denote
. Observe that
and
. From the first well-known property,
and
is the
-symmedian in
. From the second well-known property, the division
is harmonically. Since
results
. Show easily that
. Thus,
, i.e.
. From the third well-known property
, obtain
, i.e.
. Since
get
and in consequence,
.
Since
and
obtain
, i.e.
is cyclicall quadrilateral. In conclusion,
.
Remark. Here are another interesting relations :
. The proposed problem is an immediate consequence of the above lemma.
PP5 (Iran TST 2007). Let
be the incircle of the triangle
. Let
and
be two points such that
and
is tangent to the circle
.
,
touch the circle
at
,
respectively. Denote the middlepoint
of
and
. Prove that the line
is tangent to the circle
(Ali Khezeli)
Proof. Denote
,
and the midpoints
,
of the segments
,
respectively. Observe that
,
. From the well-known properties
obtain that
, i.e.
and the line
is tangent to the circle
because the lines
,
are symmetrically w.r.t the line
.
Suppose w.l.o.g.
. Denote the intersection
. Prove easily that
,
,
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversal
and the triangle
, i.e.
.
The line
is the polar
of the point
w.r.t. the circle
and the point
belongs to the polar
of the point
w.r.t.
the circle
and
the polar of
is
. Otherwise prove easily that
.
PP6. Let an acute
with the circumcircle
. Let
and the projections
,
of
on
,
respectively. Prove that the midpoint
of
is the orthocenter of
.
Proof.
,
are isogonals w.r.t.
, i.e.
and
is cyclic, i.e.
. Therefore,
. Since
and
are cyclic 
, i.e.
is the
-altitude of
. Hence
is the orthocenter of
(ARMO - 2013).













![$\delta=\frac{r}{a}\cdot \left[ p-\sqrt{p(p-a)}\right]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/6/6/d661005ea113b4346819d5da662ad51e5ffea5a7.png)







![$[BC]\ ,$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/5/6/6563ca77d31eb676ef646fa9c37ea181b812d864.png)
the segment
![$[AM]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/f/9/1f9b22599237fb6240a50b5f75e8f6ced1292374.png)










with the line










![$\left[(b-c)+(x-y)\right]^{2}+4r_{1}r_{2}=[a-(x+y)]^{2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/1/4/314ea7977a02f33789e74435e3cccdfdf935e0b7.png)


























The relation






Remark







![$\boxed{\ \delta =\frac{r}{a}\cdot \left[ p-\sqrt{p(p-a)}\right]\ }\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/3/5/2354e1652fbc38a7fb56d2bd2c225d7966fb9f37.png)
Proof 2 (without derivatives). Using the same notations from the previous proof obtain :





![$k(x+y)^{2}\ge 4[(x+y)-1]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/b/5/7b5a9829e4a3a419dd6237ed71987b08205629db.png)









Remark 1. In the case
![$r_{1}=r_{2}=\delta =\frac{r}{a}\cdot \left[p-\sqrt{p(p-a)}\right]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/d/9/3d92b9c1c67a89e0855d7d36fa98c0cefd9cd277.png)





![$[AM]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/f/9/1f9b22599237fb6240a50b5f75e8f6ced1292374.png)

Remark 2. In same case
![$r_1=r_2=\delta=\frac{r}{a}\cdot \left[ p-\sqrt{p(p-a)}\right]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/a/9/0a9d7bd303eecab9d93a6dd6db908f12c9752977.png)


![$\frac {\frac{r}{a}\cdot \left[ p-\sqrt{p(p-a)}\right]}{\frac {(r-\delta)(p-c)}r}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/7/c/a7cbd7319cd87cf6b9746d52dde6cfecf231e345.png)
![$\frac {r^2\left[p-\sqrt{p(p-a)}\right]}{(p-c)\left[ar-pr+r\sqrt{p(p-a)}\right]}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/1/8/418eef6fdcb1973c874c4e46f99bdee0ea3c6934.png)
![$\frac {r\left[p-\sqrt{p(p-a)}\right]}{(p-c)\left[\sqrt{p(p-a)}-(p-a)\right]}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/2/1/e21798fc72d171c12ca0d839330eae018bda233a.png)
























Proof 2.







(from a well-known property) the incircles of the triangles




![$[a-(x+y)]^{2}=4r_{1}r_{2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/b/2/1b288ce8f4b9af44b8535c8d30f0435f5e93aa53.png)

![$\left[a-\frac{r_{1}(p-b)+r_{2}(p-c)}{r}\right]^{2}=4r_{1}r_{2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/6/3/063313bedb49433e40549bb4da8d47dc7c9ac1e3.png)

![$\{r[(p-b)+(p-c)]-r_{1}(p-b)-$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/5/0/950e8ac7d65c3ca95fd760e14e857ebe7e98f1f6.png)



![$[(r-r_{1})(p-b)+(r-r_{2})(p-c)]^{2}=4r^{2}r_{1}r_{2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/4/1/0416777ab4653a1b6cfa392e185c2b6e2be2b9e5.png)


Otherwise.






![$(p-b)r_{1}-(p-c)r_{2}=r[(p-b)-(p-c)]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/3/3/933825ca2f65cc6e3f3254b1e15390ccdd2173c6.png)
i.e.










Apply the Menelaus's theorem to the transversals

From the relations



































w.r.t.






A similar identity. For the triangle













PP2. Let an equilateral




Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.














Particular case.


PP3. Let











Proof. Let






















corresponding quantities be

















and similarly



PP4. Let





Circle with the diameter
![$[DE]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/f/5/4f55b2be1d3d9963afec61b4973bfecc6141b1ff.png)





Lemma. Let



![$ [BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/5/5/3550468aa97af843ef34b8868728963dec043efe.png)











Proof. Denote
























Since





Remark. Here are another interesting relations :

PP5 (Iran TST 2007). Let













![$[PQ]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/1/c/21ca08816cf8b23ddf756ce9ae098ad327f2443d.png)



Proof. Denote




![$[AD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/3/0f3e4c424371b27673db323ced8ef0777940c0d4.png)
![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)






























the circle








PP6. Let an acute









![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)

Proof.



















This post has been edited 42 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Nov 13, 2015, 8:48 AM