134. Some problems with projections/perpendiculars (2).
by Virgil Nicula, Sep 30, 2010, 8:57 AM
Quote:
PP1.1. (Iran NMO, 2008-6). Let
be an acute triangle with the circumcircle
. Denote the midpoints
,
of
,
respectively,
the projection
of
on
and the projections
,
of
on
,
respectively. Prove that
.
PP1.2. (Iran NMO, 2008-2). The
-exincircle
of
touches
,
at
,
respectively. Denote the incenter
,
,
,
. Prove that the quadrilateral
is a parallelogram.
PP2. Let
be a triangle. For a point
define the point
so that
, the point
so that
,
and the intersection
. Prove that
.
PP3. Let
be a triangle with the orthocenter
and the circumcircle
. Denote 
so that
, the symmetrical point
of
w.r.t.
and
. Prove that
.
PP4. Let
,
be two lines, where
. For a point
denote
, 
so that
,
. Suppose that
. Consider two points
,
.
Prove that
.
Particular cases
. Let
be a trapezoid, where
. Denote the midpoint 
of
. Prove that
.
doesn't separates
,
. Let
be a triangle with the incircle
which touches
the sides at
,
,
. Denote
. Prove that
and
.
Let
be a triangle with the exincircle
which touches the sides at
,
,
. Denote
. Prove that
and
.
separates
,
.




![$[AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/9/3/0936990e6625d65357ca51006c08c9fe3e04ba0c.png)
![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)
the projection









PP1.2. (Iran NMO, 2008-2). The












PP2. Let









PP3. Let




so that






PP4. Let






so that





Prove that

Particular cases




of
![$[XY]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/d/5/bd5db5e85aa6daea3eebecaea5d26721edd15203.png)






the sides at






Let











Proof of PP1.1. Observe that

Therefore,





Remark.

![$4R^2\left[\left(OX^2-AE^2\right)-\left(OY^2-AF^2\right)\right]=\left(h_a^2-R^2\right)\left(b^2-c^2\right)$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/a/1/3a13042ddbe644e11e3222b587d390eb64d11566.png)
Proof 1 of PP1.2. Denote
















Therefore,





Proof 2 of PP1.2.




Proof.












Proof.



Apply Ceva's theorem to












is cyclically. In conclusion, the point









In conclusion,




Proof of PP2. Let






of











Proof of PP3. Denote the second intersection






![$[AS]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/1/f/81f842d87b22553e4b674bb2bf46a080da785009.png)
![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)



Proof of PP4.















This post has been edited 84 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Nov 23, 2015, 7:21 AM