364. Some interesting inequalities I
by Virgil Nicula, Jan 16, 2013, 9:21 PM
PP1. Let
,
and
be the sidelengths of
with the inradius
and
. Prove that
and
.
Proof 1.

. Observe that
and

,
what is truly. Have equality iff
.
Proof 2.. Let
so that
, the midpoint
of
, the incircle
, the circumcircle
and the diameter
, where
and
separates
. So
and
. Thus, 
.
Proof 3.. Let
. Thus,
. Therefore,
and
from the Ptolemy theorem obtain that
.
Proof 4, Observe that
and
. Thus,

.
PP2. Let
,
and
be the sidelengths of an acute
. Prove that
, i.e.
.
Proof 1. Let
be the tangent to the circumcircle
of
in
. Let
, where
and 
.
. Thus,
becomes
.
Proof 2. Observe that
,
,
and


.
Remark.
. If denote
, then
.
Proof. By AM-GM
. Hence
.
PP3. Prove that in any triangle
there is the inequality
.
Proof 1.
, what is truly.
Proof 2.
.
Proof 3.
. I used the well-known inequality
.
Remark.
.
PP4. Let an acute
with circumcircle
.
,
,
cut again circumcircle
of
,
,
at
,
,
respectively. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote the midpoint
of the side
and the diameter
of the circumcircle
of
. Observe that
is a right deltoid and
. Otherwise,
a.s.o.
Also,
a.s.o. In conclusion,

because
, where
.
PP5. Prove that
for any positive numbers
.
Proof. Prove easily that
. Thus,
a.s.o.
PP6. Let
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. I"ll show that
. Indeed, it is equivalently with
, what is truly because
. Hence
. In conclusion,
. Have the equality if and only if
. I applied the inequality AM (arithmetical mean)
GM (geometrical mean) for
.
Otherwise.
, what is truly.
Otherwise. Can use directly the identity
.
An easy extension. Let
and
. Prove that
. For
obtain the proposed problem PP6.
Proof 1.
.
Therefore,
. In conclusion,
. Have the equality if and only if
.
I applied the inequality AM (arithmetical mean)
GM (geometrical mean) for
. For
obtain the proposed problem.
Proof 2.
,
what is truly because
is an application of the inequality AM (arithmetical mean)
GM (geometrical mean) for
.
Equivalent enunciation.
.
Proof 1. Using the substitutions
our inequality becomes

, what is truly because its discriminant is
.
Proof 2.
,
what is truly because
is an application of the inequality AM (arithmetical mean)
GM (geometrical mean) for
.
PP7 (Abdullaev). Prove that in any
there is the inequality
.
Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.
. Thus,

, what
is truly. The Abdullaev's inequality is stronger than the Finsler-Hadwiger's inequality
.The shortest proof of the Finsler-Hadwiger's inequality is following.
Denote
and apply the Chebyshev's inequality:

.
PP8 (O.I.M. 1995). Prove that
.
Proof. With
our inequality becomes 
. I"ll use
.
Lemma. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Denote
. Observe that

.
Hence
. Otherwise. 
.
PP9. Prove that for any positive integer
.
Proof. Denote
.
Observe that
and
. Therefore,


.
An easy extension. Prove that for any
and positive integer
.
PP10.![$ \{\ a\ ,\ b\ \}\ \subset\ [\ 0\ ,\ 1\ ]\ \implies\ 1 - \ \frac {a + b}{2}\ + \ \frac {ab}{3}\ \ge\ \frac {1}{1 + a + b}$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/8/e/f8e0e9d5f412d63d90c1c6a0fbbf22a65a2ad120.png)
Proof. Denote
. The proposed inequality becomes :

. Therefore,
, with equality iff
.
, with equality iff
.

with equality iff
and
, i.e.
or
or
.
Lemma (Goldstone's inequality). Let
with the circumcircle
and the incircle
Prove that there is the inequality
(standard notations).
Proof.


In conclusion, from the relations
and
obtain that bilateral inequality
with the name Goldstone's inequality.
PP11 (George APOSTOLOPOULOS, Greece. Let
with the circumcircle
and the incircle
Prove that there is the inequality 
Proof. We can prove easily or can use the well known identities
and
a.s.o. Therefore,

a.s.o.

I"ll apply upper Goldstone's inequality
and
because
what is true.
See here








Proof 1.












![$[a+(b+c-a)]^2\ge 4a(b+c-a)\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/1/7/117796939306eb8a2dd1bb54f8a9baa118542311.png)
![$[a-(b+c-a)]^2\ge 0$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/6/f/36f76c18085d456aba9a634fca089e27a821d436.png)
what is truly. Have equality iff

Proof 2.. Let



![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)


![$[NS]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/0/d/80de18ed66832d94ce5323f567fc5b59dc992316.png)











Proof 3.. Let





from the Ptolemy theorem obtain that






Proof 4, Observe that






PP2. Let






Proof 1. Let







![$\frac {x+y+z}{2}\ge \frac 32\sqrt[3]{xyz}=\frac 32$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/7/e/87e24349c1bbab8d8eb5eba8792314559b453f1a.png)





Proof 2. Observe that



![$\left\{\begin{array}{c}
(b^2+c^2-a^2)\cdot (a^2+c^2-b^2)\le \left[\frac {(b^2+c^2-a^2)+(a^2+c^2-b^2)}{2}\right]^2=c^4\\\\
(b^2+c^2-a^2)\cdot (a^2+b^2-c^2)\le \left[\frac {(b^2+c^2-a^2)+(a^2+b^2-c^2)}{2}\right]^2=b^4\end{array}\right|\ \bigodot$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/d/3/dd3404f0eb82d5a78349f4ef4a3cf05e42e4992e.png)







Remark.




Proof. By AM-GM
![$xyz=x+y+z\ge 3\sqrt[3]{xyz} \implies xyz \ge 3\sqrt3$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/0/b/10bb6892494ed3cef1bd81b63fbeb74051de3f5e.png)


![$\frac{4x}{4\sqrt[4]{\frac{x^6}{27}}}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/f/b/dfbd7a165bc5c0815a083bd7725fbba9f0cb267f.png)
![$\frac{\sqrt[4]{27}}{\sqrt{x}} =$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/4/8/84848747c93f331b1fd7e9436389a5437788e3bb.png)
![$ \frac{\sqrt[4]{27}\cdot\sqrt{yz}}{\sqrt{xyz}}\le $](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/7/a/77a8333630836a56da52f45af91f16ead67871ae.png)
![$\frac{\sqrt[4]{27}\cdot\sqrt{yz}}{\sqrt[4]{27}} =$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/3/b/43b8a2b629817c1141a3e37321b0bdb1b5309513.png)

PP3. Prove that in any triangle


Proof 1.





Proof 2.





Proof 3.



Remark.





PP4. Let an acute





of







Proof. Denote the midpoint

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
![$[OA_1]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/6/f/26fd43875ad2164b8741ee54161e8da13bed7fd1.png)









Also,










PP5. Prove that


Proof. Prove easily that
![$\left[a+(b+c)\right]^2\ge 4a(b+c)$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/2/3/023be1f51f2a0f4d263660b1ae57140ea84d17b3.png)


PP6. Let



Proof. I"ll show that




![$3\sqrt [3]{\frac {a^3}{2}\cdot\frac {a^3}{2}\cdot 32}=6a^2$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/5/4/254d40bfa4819113bea57e133043ea06a4c15e76.png)






Otherwise.




Otherwise. Can use directly the identity


An easy extension. Let




Proof 1.




Therefore,




I applied the inequality AM (arithmetical mean)



Proof 2.





what is truly because



Equivalent enunciation.

Proof 1. Using the substitutions





Proof 2.




what is truly because
![$\frac {a+c}{2b}+\frac {b}{a}+\frac {2a}{a+c}\ge 3\sqrt[3]{\frac {a+c}{2b}\cdot\frac {b}{a}\cdot\frac {2a}{a+c}}=3$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/4/b/74be9a6941b116e197771922ed9766403d46cec1.png)


PP7 (Abdullaev). Prove that in any


Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.











is truly. The Abdullaev's inequality is stronger than the Finsler-Hadwiger's inequality

Denote







PP8 (O.I.M. 1995). Prove that

Proof. With






![$\frac 32\cdot\sqrt[3]{xyz}=\frac 32$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/c/8/fc8bad4d9abf1f710263e629c353aa80e289b761.png)
Lemma. Prove that

Proof 1. Denote






Hence








-\left(x^{n+2}-x^2\right)}{(x-1)^2}{}\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/b/9/8b9e675e450df0c2f1e1d4390acb3c0494804af0.png)

PP9. Prove that for any positive integer

Proof. Denote

Observe that















An easy extension. Prove that for any


PP10.
![$ \{\ a\ ,\ b\ \}\ \subset\ [\ 0\ ,\ 1\ ]\ \implies\ 1 - \ \frac {a + b}{2}\ + \ \frac {ab}{3}\ \ge\ \frac {1}{1 + a + b}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/8/e/f8e0e9d5f412d63d90c1c6a0fbbf22a65a2ad120.png)
Proof. Denote





















with equality iff





Lemma (Goldstone's inequality). Let




Proof.









In conclusion, from the relations



PP11 (George APOSTOLOPOULOS, Greece. Let




Proof. We can prove easily or can use the well known identities












I"ll apply upper Goldstone's inequality






See here
This post has been edited 201 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Jan 30, 2018, 6:44 PM