381. Probleme date la diverse concursuri.
by Virgil Nicula, Jul 24, 2013, 12:57 AM
PP0. Examen National de Definitivat - 2013.
1. Fie o prog. aritm.
,
cu ratia
si o prog. geom.
,
cu ratia
,
si
. Sa se arate ca
si
.
2. In
fie
bisectoarea lui
,
. Sa se calculeze
stiind ca
si
sa se arate ca
.
3. Se considera functia
, unde
ai
. Sa se calculeze
si sa se arate ca
.
An easy extension. Se considera functia
, unde
este o functie continua pe
si
. Sa se arate ca
.
Demonstratie.
1. Notam
. Astfel,
. Se observa ca
. Fie
. Asadar, 
, ceea ce este evident deoarece
si suma a 
numere mai mari decat
este un numar real mai mare decat
.
Remarca. Dupa parerea mea, s-ar fi potrivit si o a treia cerinta: sa se determine una din sumele
sau
in functie de
.
2. Daca
si
, atunci
este
-dreptunghic cu
, adica
. Revenim la cazul
general. Asadar,
si
deoarece
.
Remarca.
, unde
este cercul inscris al
, adica
este tangential (la limita!)
, adica
este punctul de tangenta intre
si cercul inscris in
.
3.
si

. Asadar,
. In concluzie,
.
PP1. Prove that the Mandelbrot's relation
.
Proof 1. Can use the well-known relation
. Therefore,
.
I"ll prove
. Let circumcircle
of
and

.
Proof 2.
. Thus,

and analogously
.
Remark. Since
we can prove easily that
.
PP2. Equilateral triangles are constructed on the sides of the same rectangle in two different ways as shown below. The area of the bold triangle on the left
is two times the area of the bold triangle on the right. Find the ratio of the length of the shorter side of the rectangle to the length of the longer side (sursa).
Proof Let a rectangle
with
. Denote the points
so that:
are equilateral triangles;
separates 
and doesn't separate
separates
and doesn't separate
(see the lower figure). Suppose that the area
. I"ll prove that
, 
are equilateral triangles and find the ratio
. Observe that
and by
.
Therefore, the triangles
si
are equilateral. Apply the generalized Pythagoras' theorem 
. Therefore,
.
PP3 Let a rectangle
with the center
and
. A line through
cut
in
respectively.
Denote the midpoints
of
respectively. Prove that
.
Proof 1. I"ll a metrical characterization of the perpendicularity between two lines. Suppose w.l.o.g. that
si
. Denote
,
,
,
,
. Thus,
![$\left[b^2+\left(\frac a2-x\right)^2\right]=$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/a/a/6aafaaa8cb52fc254f50ba57121f87c440da8f91.png)
este ciclic
.
Proof 2. Suppose w.l.o.g.that
and
. Let the midpoint
of
and

. Apply Menelaus' theorem of

is altitude
is orthocenter of

Prove easily that if
is a parallelogram and
, then
, i.e.
is harmonically. If
is a rectangle and
,
then
,
are the bisectors of
,
respectively,
and a circle which pass through
,
is ortogonal to the circumcircle of
.
PP4. Let
and for
,
,
denote
.
Prove that
. For
get that
.
Proof. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversals
. Thus, 
.
PP5. Let a trapezoid
, where
and
. Denote the second intersection
between the circumcircles
of
,
and
. Prove
, i.e. the ray
is the
-symmedian of
.
Proof.
cut again the circumcircles
,
of
,
in
,
respectively. Thus,
. Since
belongs to the
radical axis of
,
obtain that
. I"ll use the powers of
,
w.r.t.
,
respectively
. In conclusion,
.
PP6. Let an acute and
-isosceles
. Denote the midpoints
,
of the sides
,
respectively. Prove that 
Proof. Prove easily that in any triangle
there is the equivalence
. If
is isosceles, i.e.
, then 
Suppose w.l.o.g.
and
. Apply the generalized Pythagoras' theorem
. Thus,
and
.
Observe that
, where
is the projection of
on
has the lengths of the sides proportionally with
,
,
, more exactly
. Remark. The relation
means there is a synthetical proof. Can use the chain of the equivalencies
belongs to the circle with the diameter
is the incenter of
, where
is the projection of
on
and
, where
,
and
is the symmetrical point of
w.r.t.
. With other words, on the segment
have the chain of the equal ratios
and the
division
is harmonically, i.e.
. For example, from the relation
obtain that
, i.e.
.
An easy extension. Let an acute
. Let the midpoints
,
of
,
respectively. Prove that
with equality if
.
PP7. Let an
-rightangled
. Prove that
(Crux Mathematicorum).
Proof.
. Thus
.
On other hand
because
. In conclusion, from
,
and
obtain that
.
Generalization (own). Prove that in any triangle
there is the implication

PP8 (Stefan Smarandache). Let
be the semiperimeter of
with
,
and which is inscribed in the circle
. Prove that 
Proof. Denote
Thus,
and we must prove that the maximum of
is
, i.e. the maximum of
is equally to 
Prove easily that in the extremum case the center
is an interior point and
, i.e.

Thus, the sum
is
is
is
is
Since
(constant) obtain that
is 
, i.e.
and in this case 
Otherwise. Denote the midpoints
,
of
,
respectively and
,
. Thus,
si
, 
and the sum
is
is
Concursul Naţional de Matematică "N.N. Mihăileanu" - Constanţa, 2015.
PP9 (Florian Gache). Let
be a square and
be an interior point so that
is
equilateral. Let
and the symmetrical
of
w.r.t.
. Prove that
.
Proof 1.
.
Proof 2. Denote
and suppose w.l.o.g.
. Thus,
. Observe
that
. Thus,
. In conclusion,
. Otherwise.
,
and
. Thus,
.
PP10 (O.M. Ukraina, 2013). Let an obtuse
with circumcircle
for which denote
circle
so that
and 
circle
so that
and
. Prove that
is the midpoint of
.
Proof.
.
PP11 (O.M. Romania). Let the parallelogram
for which denote
the circle
so that
and
the circle
so that
and
. Prove that
is cyclically
.
Proof. Denote
and
. Observe that
is the common exterior tangent of the circles
,
and
is their radical axis. Hence the midpoint
of
, i.e. the midpoint of
belongs to
, i.e.
. Since
obtain that
, i.e. the quadrilateral
is cyclically. Thus,
. From
and
obtain that
, i.e.
.
Lemma. Let
be an acute triangle. Define: the circumcircle
and the orthocentre
of the triangle
; the middlepoint
of the side
; the intersection
between
and the bisector of the angle
;
and
so that
and
. Then the point
belongs to the circumcircle
of the triangle
.
Proof.
and
. Thus,

Let
, i.e.
. Thus,
and

, i.e.
belongs to circumcircle of 
PP12 (Swiss IMO Selection 2006). Let an acute
with the orthocenter
, the midpoint
of
and two points ![$D\in [AB]\ ,$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/8/b/d8b680a8f7969787e4093b6a09e5097228a0be32.png)
such that
. Prove that
is perpendicular to common chord of circumscribed circles of
.
Proof Denote:
; the midpoint
of
;
. From the above lemma results
. But 
is midpoint of
,
and
. Thus
,
,
are midpoints of
,
,
respectively and 
and
. In conclusion,
. Remark. I denote ray
without the point
.
PP13 (NMO England 2005, level VII). Let
be a triangle with
and the incenter
for what denote
. Prove that
.
Proof. Nice property and v.v. easy proof, without words, maybe for Pisa's test. Prove easily that
is
-excenter of
and
is
-excenter of
. In conclusion, 
PP13 (NMO England 2008, level VII). Solve over
the system 
Proof 1. Denote
Thus, our system becomes

![$\begin{array}{ccccccccccc}
\nearrow & p=3 & \implies & \odot & \begin{array}{ccc}
\nearrow & xy=1 & \searrow\\\\
\rightarrow & yz=1 & \rightarrow\\\\
\searrow & zx=9 & \nearrow\end{array} & \odot & \begin{array}{ccc}
\nearrow & x=3 & \searrow\\\\
\rightarrow & y=\frac 13 & \rightarrow \\\\
\searrow & z=3 & \nearrow \end{array} & \odot & \implies & \left(\ 3\ ,\ \frac 13\ ,\ 3\ \right) & \searrow\\\\
\searrow & p=8 & \implies & \odot & \begin{array}{ccc}
\nearrow & xy=-4 & \searrow\\\\
\rightarrow & yz=-4 & \rightarrow\\\\
\searrow & zx=4 & \nearrow\end{array} & \odot & \begin{array}{ccc}
\nearrow & x=-2 & \searrow\\\\
\rightarrow & y=2 & \rightarrow\\\\
\searrow & z=-2 & \nearrow\end{array} & \odot & \implies & (\ -2\ ,\ 2\ ,\ -2\ ) & \nearrow\end{array}\odot\ \implies\ \left[\begin{array}{ccc}
3 & \frac 13 & 3\\\\
-2 & 2 & -2\end{array}\right]\ .$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/e/4/3e404278bea802e39e25b7bd8366755782254589.png)
Proof 2. Denote
Thus, our system becomes

Therefore,

In conclusion, 
PP14 (Contest 2015, Hungary). Let
so that
. Prove that ![$\{x,y,z\}\subset \left[1,\frac 73\right]\ .$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/8/e/d8e1fabda92bf1fccbe35bcb4a60ab9ae8d7d542.png)
Proof 1. Observe that
and
, i.e.
Apply the simple inequality 
![$\{x,y,z\}\subset \left[1,\frac 73\right]\ .$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/8/e/d8e1fabda92bf1fccbe35bcb4a60ab9ae8d7d542.png)
An easy extension. Let
so that
where
(is obviously!). Prove that ![$\{x,y,z\}\subset \left[\frac {a-2\sqrt{\Delta}}3,\frac {a+\sqrt{\Delta}}3\right]\ .$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/4/4/b445f11bec99f1ae0db0385e20de1acedb9f992b.png)
PP15. Let an
-right-angled
so that
. Find the value of the expression 
Proof. Is well-known that
and the inequality
Thus,
and 

, i.e.
. Therefore,
Hence,

PP16. Prove that if
are the angles of an acute-angled triangle
, then
Please, use only
Proof. Denote
, where
and
. Thus,
. Hence
.
Remark.
.
PP17 (selection test, Brazil). The real numbers
verify the relations
. Calculate the product 
Proof 1.
.
Observe that the real numbers
are the roots of the equation
and 
Proof 2. Observe that
In conclusion,
are the roots of the equation
, i.e.
.
PP18 (Hungary, 2013). Solve over
the equation
Proof. I"ll use the substitution
, i.e.
where
because the equation
has the discriminant
. Therefore,
and given equation become
.
In conclusion,
and
.
PP19 (ONM England, 2005). Prove that
Proof (bitrak). I"ll apply C.B.S. - inequality

Very nice proof !
An easy extension. Prove that
so that
.
Particular case.
.
Proof.
PP20 (selection test, Pakistan). Prove that
and

Proof.I"ll apply the substitution
.
Therefore,

![$(y-x)\left[x^2(y-z)+x\left(y^2-yz\right)+z^3-y^2z\right]=0\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/d/5/3d57b1f651aff45a124b59da4f7ffce84defa389.png)
PP21 (concurs Canada). Solve over
the following system 
Proof. I"ll isolate the variable
. From the equations
and
obtain that


PP22. Sa se determine
stiind ca 
Proof. Se observa ca
Deci solutiile
ecuatiei date sunt aceleasi cu solutiile sistemului de ecuatii
In concluzie,
astfel incat 
PP23 (O.M. England round 1 2011). Let
and
be the feet of altitudes from
and
respectively in an acute
Prove that
When is equality?
Proof.
i.e.
Since

our required inequality becomes
what is true. Have equality iff 
PP24. Aratati ca daca
atunci 
Demonstratie.

PP24 (Pham Van Thuan). Let
so that
Find the maximum value of 
Proof. Can use the substitution
because
Therefore,
and
In conclusion, our problem becomes to find the maximum of
Thus, 
PP25. Let
be a triangle. Its
-bisector meet again its circumcircle
in
Suppose that exists
so that
Prove that 
Proof. Get
and
Denote
Thus, 

Remark 1.

Remark 2. If
is the midpoint of
then can prove easily that
Here are some usual metrical relations 
1. Fie o prog. aritm.










2. In








3. Se considera functia

![$x\in [0,1]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/6/1/561b0f8577e618149adc3fae918f20a4a4d4c5ca.png)



An easy extension. Se considera functia


![$[0,1]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/8/6/e861e10e1c19918756b9c8b7717684593c63aeb8.png)


Demonstratie.
1. Notam










numere mai mari decat


Remarca. Dupa parerea mea, s-ar fi potrivit si o a treia cerinta: sa se determine una din sumele



2. Daca







general. Asadar,





Remarca.















3.




![$\int\left[e^x-f_n(x)\right]\ \mathrm{dx}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/5/8/f58dafd061601dfaf1355cf9ea00f45988625c5f.png)







PP1. Prove that the Mandelbrot's relation

Proof 1. Can use the well-known relation





I"ll prove












Proof 2.










Remark. Since


PP2. Equilateral triangles are constructed on the sides of the same rectangle in two different ways as shown below. The area of the bold triangle on the left
is two times the area of the bold triangle on the right. Find the ratio of the length of the shorter side of the rectangle to the length of the longer side (sursa).
Proof Let a rectangle






and doesn't separate



![$[MNC]=2\cdot [RPC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/1/9/919c76e0344c19c728d5b6a2f2d0009b823b387b.png)


are equilateral triangles and find the ratio



Therefore, the triangles




![$[MNC]=2\cdot [RPC]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/4/5/d450ccb1558644000e17b24e4bfe69a29555d1a7.png)




PP3 Let a rectangle






Denote the midpoints

![$[CD]\ ,\ [AD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/5/f/b5f204323543b131d081d45e3ea5dc796b91518b.png)

Proof 1. I"ll a metrical characterization of the perpendicularity between two lines. Suppose w.l.o.g. that









![$\left[(a-x)^2+(b+y)^2\right]-$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/6/a/96ae01ab9589fe7092a86654011b825b18c1f21b.png)
![$\left[b^2+\left(\frac a2-x\right)^2\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/a/a/6aafaaa8cb52fc254f50ba57121f87c440da8f91.png)
![$\left[a^2+\left(y+\frac b2\right)^2\right]-\frac {a^2+b^2}{4}\ \iff\ ax=by\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/5/4/754f70b88848e647cb5a4a5d252fcb8abdf0930a.png)




Proof 2. Suppose w.l.o.g.that



![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)




























then








PP4. Let





Prove that



Proof. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversals






PP5. Let a trapezoid




of







Proof.










radical axis of













PP6. Let an acute and




![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)
![$[AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/9/3/0936990e6625d65357ca51006c08c9fe3e04ba0c.png)

Proof. Prove easily that in any triangle





Suppose w.l.o.g.





Observe that











![$[BC]\iff G$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/7/9/c79b4b0a058c26dc0fd01de708fcb5253037b082.png)

















division





An easy extension. Let an acute



![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)
![$[AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/9/3/0936990e6625d65357ca51006c08c9fe3e04ba0c.png)


PP7. Let an



Proof.




On other hand


![$3\sqrt[3]{\frac{a^6(b+c)^2}{4b^4c^4}}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/3/8/638db97c165a91879b49dc4208d55c763a8d3062.png)
![$6\cdot \frac {a^2}{2bc}\cdot\sqrt [3]{\frac {(b+c)^2}{4bc}}\ge 6\cdot 1\cdot\sqrt [3] 1=6\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/e/4/6e448822f3b2e14ade950e2e058c43883c95f683.png)








Generalization (own). Prove that in any triangle



PP8 (Stefan Smarandache). Let






Proof. Denote






Prove easily that in the extremum case the center





Thus, the sum













Otherwise. Denote the midpoints


![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)
![$[CD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/7/0/e70960e9e5738a46ad23f794e796ef3cb4ad7e2c.png)





and the sum







Concursul Naţional de Matematică "N.N. Mihăileanu" - Constanţa, 2015.
PP9 (Florian Gache). Let



equilateral. Let





Proof 1.





Proof 2. Denote





that










PP10 (O.M. Ukraina, 2013). Let an obtuse






circle




![$[AE]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/e/e/0ee81ab9421e97824f7785dc2c44c0f5b04a03b1.png)
Proof.


PP11 (O.M. Romania). Let the parallelogram










Proof. Denote
























Lemma. Let





![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)










Proof.























PP12 (Swiss IMO Selection 2006). Let an acute



![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
![$D\in [AB]\ ,$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/8/b/d8b680a8f7969787e4093b6a09e5097228a0be32.png)
![$E\in [AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/5/4/b541285a383c6900e63ba311ec807f4700713778.png)



Proof Denote:


![$[AH]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/3/b/03b8986ebe750b377f987f87b41a1dbc4c128e17.png)




![$[HA'])$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/9/8/4980b67c784e07a157eb166d9bfd2e65b80e9a72.png)















PP13 (NMO England 2005, level VII). Let





Proof. Nice property and v.v. easy proof, without words, maybe for Pisa's test. Prove easily that







PP13 (NMO England 2008, level VII). Solve over


Proof 1. Denote




![$\begin{array}{ccccccccccc}
\nearrow & p=3 & \implies & \odot & \begin{array}{ccc}
\nearrow & xy=1 & \searrow\\\\
\rightarrow & yz=1 & \rightarrow\\\\
\searrow & zx=9 & \nearrow\end{array} & \odot & \begin{array}{ccc}
\nearrow & x=3 & \searrow\\\\
\rightarrow & y=\frac 13 & \rightarrow \\\\
\searrow & z=3 & \nearrow \end{array} & \odot & \implies & \left(\ 3\ ,\ \frac 13\ ,\ 3\ \right) & \searrow\\\\
\searrow & p=8 & \implies & \odot & \begin{array}{ccc}
\nearrow & xy=-4 & \searrow\\\\
\rightarrow & yz=-4 & \rightarrow\\\\
\searrow & zx=4 & \nearrow\end{array} & \odot & \begin{array}{ccc}
\nearrow & x=-2 & \searrow\\\\
\rightarrow & y=2 & \rightarrow\\\\
\searrow & z=-2 & \nearrow\end{array} & \odot & \implies & (\ -2\ ,\ 2\ ,\ -2\ ) & \nearrow\end{array}\odot\ \implies\ \left[\begin{array}{ccc}
3 & \frac 13 & 3\\\\
-2 & 2 & -2\end{array}\right]\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/e/4/3e404278bea802e39e25b7bd8366755782254589.png)
Proof 2. Denote






Therefore,











PP14 (Contest 2015, Hungary). Let


![$\{x,y,z\}\subset \left[1,\frac 73\right]\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/8/e/d8e1fabda92bf1fccbe35bcb4a60ab9ae8d7d542.png)
Proof 1. Observe that







![$\{x,y,z\}\subset \left[1,\frac 73\right]\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/8/e/d8e1fabda92bf1fccbe35bcb4a60ab9ae8d7d542.png)
An easy extension. Let



![$\{x,y,z\}\subset \left[\frac {a-2\sqrt{\Delta}}3,\frac {a+\sqrt{\Delta}}3\right]\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/4/4/b445f11bec99f1ae0db0385e20de1acedb9f992b.png)
PP15. Let an




Proof. Is well-known that
















PP16. Prove that if




Proof. Denote



![$xyz=x+y+z\ge 3\sqrt[3]{xyz}\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/1/4/81481154976aa36ba923cdc60c9d8a792caeeab7.png)



Remark.



PP17 (selection test, Brazil). The real numbers



Proof 1.

Observe that the real numbers



Proof 2. Observe that





PP18 (Hungary, 2013). Solve over


Proof. I"ll use the substitution








In conclusion,




PP19 (ONM England, 2005). Prove that

Proof (bitrak). I"ll apply C.B.S. - inequality






An easy extension. Prove that




Particular case.

Proof.
PP20 (selection test, Pakistan). Prove that



Proof.I"ll apply the substitution


Therefore,





![$(y-x)\left[z^3-z\left(x^2+xy+y^2\right)+xy(x+y)\right]=0\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/f/eafb60e2bef44ea076391c0ca03de2fafa64912a.png)
![$(y-x)\left[x^2(y-z)+x\left(y^2-yz\right)+z^3-y^2z\right]=0\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/d/5/3d57b1f651aff45a124b59da4f7ffce84defa389.png)
![$(y-x)(y-z)\left[x^2+xy-z(y+z)\right]=0\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/c/b/acb34453ad1efd88d6b7bb6d9260ad4efafd640a.png)
![$\left[\left(x^2-z^2\right)+y(x-z)\right]=0\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/4/b/74b0948fb67628f48ca8b1311c6f352b7b223f8a.png)

PP21 (concurs Canada). Solve over


Proof. I"ll isolate the variable









PP22. Sa se determine


Proof. Se observa ca

ecuatiei date sunt aceleasi cu solutiile sistemului de ecuatii



PP23 (O.M. England round 1 2011). Let








Proof.







PP24. Aratati ca daca


Demonstratie.






PP24 (Pham Van Thuan). Let



Proof. Can use the substitution
![$|x-y|=t\in \left[0,\sqrt 2\right]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/6/1/d61c7a2fcecfb50be823e85e3c7ab78f6ec90337.png)






PP25. Let







Proof. Get









Remark 1.

![$4R^2\left[\sin^2\left(B+\frac A2\right)-\sin^2\frac A2\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/b/d/5bd74212f4cb1af130a164224f6012f666508811.png)



Remark 2. If

![$[BC]\ ,$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/5/6/6563ca77d31eb676ef646fa9c37ea181b812d864.png)


This post has been edited 324 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Jun 19, 2016, 2:37 AM