408. Geometry 1.
by Virgil Nicula, Mar 4, 2015, 1:13 PM
PP1. Let an
-isosceles
with the point
so that
and the incircle
of
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
,
and the midpoint
of
. Observe that 
. Thus,

. Otherwise. Apply the Pythagoras' theorem
to
a.s.o.
PP2. Let an equilateral
with
so that
and
. Denote 
and
with
. Prove that
, where
is the area of the triangle
.
Proof. Denote
. Apply the Stewart's relation to


. Thus,
. Apply the well-known identity
, i.e.

. In the particular case
obtain
.
PP3. Prove that in a
there is the Ionescu - Weitzenbock's inequality
, where
is the area of
.
Proof. I"ll use the well-known identity
. Denote
. The identity 
becomes
. Hence
.
PP4. Let an
-right
with the incircle
and the excircles
,
. Denote
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. Is well-known that
and
. Denote the projections
,
of
on the sidelines
,
respectively.
Apply the Menelaus' theorem to
.
, i.e.
.
Remark 1.
.
Remark 2.
with midpoint
of
and
-symmedian
, where
, where
is the distance of
to the line
.
An easy extension. Let
with the incircle
and the excircles
,
. Denote
. Prove that
.
Remark. In the particular case
, i.e.
obtain that
![$\frac {c\left[c^2+c(b-a)\right]}{b\left[b^2+b(c-a)\right]}=\frac {c^2(b+c-a)}{b^2(b+c-a)}\implies$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/8/9/089a78ed81bc43894e9f657b71924eb6c53c41c0.png)
, i.e.
is the
-symmedian. Since
obtain that
is the
-altitude, i.e.
.
Proof. Is well-known that
and
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversal 
. Apply an well-known identity 
. Remark that
![$\frac {c\left[c^2-2bc\cos A+c(b-a)\right]}{b\left[b^2-2bc\cos A+b(c-a)\right]}\implies$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/6/7/e67d943a06bb9e70cdf06b17455fc4316e3c138c.png)
. In the particular case
, i.e.
obtain that
is the
-altitude, i.e.
.
Lemma. Let
be a trapezoid so that
and
,
so that
. Then there is the relation
.
Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.
and let
,
so that
and
. Thus,
,
and
.
Therefore,
.
PP5. Let
and the points
. Denote
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Let
so that
. Thus,

.
Proof 2. Let
and
so that
. Thus,

.
Proof 3. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversals


.
Proof of the second relation. Apply an well-known relation to the cevians
.
Proof of the third relation. The third relation (an implication) is also simply. Denote the intersection
and apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversals 
. The required relation becomes 

what is truly because
are collinearly and this relation is the Menelaus' condtion for it.
Remark. If
, then
and our relation becomes
. From Aubel's relation
,
where
, obtain that
, what means that the division
is harmonically.
PP6. Let a square
and the circle
, where
. Consider the points
and 
so that the line
is tangent to
in the point
. Prove that
is cyclically, where
is the midpoint of
.
Proof 1 (metric). Denote
and
, where
. Observe that

. Prove easily that
. Therefore, 
is a cyclical quadrilateral
. Analogously obtain that
is a cyclical quadrilateral
.
In conclusion,
is cyclically and its circumcircle is the Euler's circle of the triangle
.
Proof 2 (synthetic). Prove easily that
are cyclical deltoids
(with common value 
(with common value
where
with common value 
Therefore,
a.s.o.
Remark. The length
of the circumradius for
.
The minimum area of
is touched when
and in this case
, i.e.
.
PP7. Construct
and
outside of
where
. Let
so that
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (synthetic). Denote the midpoints
of
,
,
respectively. Prove easily that
. Thus,
and
, i.e. 
is
-isosceles right triangle. Denote the midpoint
of
. So
, i.e.
is the midline of the trapezoid
.
Proof 2 (trigonometric). Denote
where
and apply the theorem of Sines in 
and

what is truly.
PP8. Let a
-isosceles
, the midpoint
of
and the projection
of
on
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote:
, i.e.
; the midpoint
of
, i.e.
; the intersection
, i.e.
is the centroid of
and
the incircle of
; the projection
of
on
, i.e.
. Prove easily that
and
, i.e. 
and
. Thus,
and
belong to the circle with the diameter
, i.e.
. Therefore,
. Thus,
and

. Since
obtain that
.
PP9. Let
be a triangle with
and the incircle
which touches
at
,
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1.
.
Remark 1. Can prove easily the relation
. Indeed, let
so that
and
. Observe that 
is an equilateral triangle, i.e.
and
.
Remark 2. Denote
. Is well-known that the division
is harmonically and
.
Proof 2 (Mihai Miculita). Denote
and
so that
. Prove easily that
is the
-excenter of 
and
is the
- excenter of
. In conclusion, the ray
is the bisector of
and the ray
is the bisector of
, i.e.
. Very nice !
PP10. An acute
with
so that
,
which is tangent to
at
and
.
Proof 1 (Sunken Rock). Let
,
be the midpoints of
,
respectively. Since
,
are cyclically obtain that
.
In conclusion,
.
Proof 2. Denote
. Thus,
. In conclusion, we"ll get the following implication chains 
.
An easy extension. Let an acute
and a circle
which is tangent to
at
.
Denote
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Let
,
be the midpoints of the segments
,
respectively. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversal 
and the triangle
. Since
,
are cyclically obtain that 
.
Proof 2. Prove easily that
.
PP11. Let a cyclical quadrilateral
where
. Denote the midpoints
of the sides ![$([AB],[BC],[CD],[DA])$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/6/6/866a1d9bd29a04196d9f1cb516181e689cccfb67.png)
respectively. Construct the circumcircles of the triangles
,
and denote
- their radical axis. Prove that
(O.N.M. Serbia, 2015).
Nice proof (Mihai Miculita) ! Denote
. Therefore,
.
Denote the circumcircle
of
the circumcircle
of
and the circumcircle
of
.
Therefore,
is cyclic
from the power
of
w.r.t.
obtain that
. Thus,
is cyclic
.
is cyclic
.
From
obtain that
. Since
,
are cyclical quadrilaterals obtain
and
.
PP12. Let
two exterior tangent circles
with
their an exterior common tangent
where
the circle
which is tangent in
to
and which is exterior tangent to the circles
in
respectively. Prove that
and 
the quadrilaterals
,
and
are cyclically
is the bisector of the angle
, i.e.
.
Proof.
Let 
and
. Therefore 
.
the quadrilateral
is cyclic.
the quadrilateral
is cyclic.
the quadrilateral
is cyclic.
Let
. Thus,
and
.
Denote
and apply Menelaus' theorem to
and
.
Application. Construct at least a circle
so that a given point
belongs to
and
is tangent to given circles
and
.
Proof. Let
,
so that
is a common exterior tangent of the circles
,
. Denote
and
,
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to
and the points
. Suppose w.l.o.g. that
. Denote 
. Thus,

and
the quadrilateral 
is cyclically. Denote
. Hence from the powers of
w.r.t. the circumcircles of
and
obtain that 
, i.e.
belongs to the circumcircle of
. In conclusion,
- the required circle and
is exterior tangent to
a.s.o. 
PP13 (Miguel Ochoa Sanchez). Let
with
and the incircle
which touches 
at
,
and
. Prove that
Proof. Let
. Apply the theorem of Sines in
and

![$\cos\frac {x+15^{\circ}}2\left[\sin 15^{\circ}+\sin (2x-15^{\circ})\right]=\sin (2x-15^{\circ})\cos\frac {x-45^{\circ}}2\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/b/5/7b5c9b37ce43cc999d04346d7d95afaa8c85d7e1.png)
![$\sin x\left[\cos\left(\frac {3x-15^{\circ}}2+\cos\frac {x-45^{\circ}}2\right)\right]=\sin (2x-15^{\circ})\cos\frac {x-45^{\circ} }2\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/9/0/19046874d4c66b7ddf042e6a84405c00b7f618a2.png)


.
Extension. Is well-known that
. Thus,



. For
get
and
.
PP14 (M.O. Sanchez). Let
and
so that
and
, where
. Prove that
(degrees) .
Proof 1. Observe that
is
-isosceles

and
. Apply the theorem of Sines in

.
PP15 (M.O. Sanchez). Let
with incenter
for which let
Prove that 
Proof.
Apply the Menelaus' theorem

and









Proof. Denote














to

![$(r+x)^2+r^2(m+2)^2=[r(m+1)+x]^2\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/8/8/088afaf95257b00c840a0e04260643eefc489593.png)

PP2. Let an equilateral





and





Proof. Denote




![$2\left[c^2+(a+b)^2+2c(a+b)\right]-2ab-c(a+b)=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/4/8/748e956712e3b17d1f0f1384041de4186a42dcd5.png)




![$4[MAN]=\left(AM^2+AN^2-MN^2\right)\tan\widehat{MAN}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/f/5/8f539a9e4ee299d065294e086401faff48d1f832.png)



![$2\left[c^2-\left(a^2+b^2+ab\right)\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/b/e/0be15c0fd23ec565dfde4472214c3c1e1f3116db.png)




PP3. Prove that in a




Proof. I"ll use the well-known identity



becomes



PP4. Let an








Proof. Is well-known that







Apply the Menelaus' theorem to






Remark 1.




Remark 2.


![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)








An easy extension. Let






Remark. In the particular case



![$\frac {c\left[c^2+c(b-a)\right]}{b\left[b^2+b(c-a)\right]}=\frac {c^2(b+c-a)}{b^2(b+c-a)}\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/8/9/089a78ed81bc43894e9f657b71924eb6c53c41c0.png)







Proof. Is well-known that










![$\frac {SB}{SC}=\frac {c\left[\left(a^2-b^2\right)+c(b-a)\right]}{b\left[\left(a^2-c^2\right)+b(c-a)\right]}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/1/6/51656467e1ff4e180e50cdd9824b8ed5a95ca1b8.png)
![$\frac {c\left[c^2-2bc\cos A+c(b-a)\right]}{b\left[b^2-2bc\cos A+b(c-a)\right]}\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/6/7/e67d943a06bb9e70cdf06b17455fc4316e3c138c.png)







Lemma. Let






Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.








Therefore,





PP5. Let




Proof 1. Let






Proof 2. Let










Proof 3. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversals








Proof of the second relation. Apply an well-known relation to the cevians



Proof of the third relation. The third relation (an implication) is also simply. Denote the intersection











Remark. If




where



PP6. Let a square





so that the line





![$[EF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/6/3/763239c0ce4fccc63411d3d6cb0011f7f6cc3a31.png)
Proof 1 (metric). Denote






















In conclusion,


Proof 2 (synthetic). Prove easily that












Therefore,

Remark. The length




The minimum area of



![$\boxed{\ \sqrt 2-1\ \le\ \frac {[EAF]}{a^2}\ < \frac 12\ }$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/a/d/6ad9f025c4adf7162c0061bf1c40302aa87d19cc.png)
PP7. Construct







Proof 1 (synthetic). Denote the midpoints

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)
![$[AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/9/3/0936990e6625d65357ca51006c08c9fe3e04ba0c.png)




is


![$[MN]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/6/2/162e03b9cf481dcfb3d5bdf078be84feab5d2f6e.png)

![$[DE]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/f/5/4f55b2be1d3d9963afec61b4973bfecc6141b1ff.png)


Proof 2 (trigonometric). Denote












PP8. Let a



![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)




Proof. Denote:



![$[AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/9/3/0936990e6625d65357ca51006c08c9fe3e04ba0c.png)




the incircle of








and



![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)
















PP9. Let








Proof 1.




Remark 1. Can prove easily the relation





is an equilateral triangle, i.e.



Remark 2. Denote



Proof 2 (Mihai Miculita). Denote






and








PP10. An acute









Proof 1 (Sunken Rock). Let


![$[DE]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/f/5/4f55b2be1d3d9963afec61b4973bfecc6141b1ff.png)
![$[FG]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/9/0f9b357c5e6613e1cba5fb221ffcccd888d76b34.png)



In conclusion,




Proof 2. Denote






An easy extension. Let an acute




Denote


Proof 1. Let


![$[DE]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/f/5/4f55b2be1d3d9963afec61b4973bfecc6141b1ff.png)
![$[FG]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/9/0f9b357c5e6613e1cba5fb221ffcccd888d76b34.png)

and the triangle









Proof 2. Prove easily that




PP11. Let a cyclical quadrilateral



![$([AB],[BC],[CD],[DA])$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/6/6/866a1d9bd29a04196d9f1cb516181e689cccfb67.png)
respectively. Construct the circumcircles of the triangles




Nice proof (Mihai Miculita) ! Denote


Denote the circumcircle







Therefore,

























From







PP12. Let












the quadrilaterals






Proof.





































Application. Construct at least a circle






Proof. Let





















is cyclically. Denote












PP13 (Miguel Ochoa Sanchez). Let




at




Proof. Let







![$\cos\frac {x+15^{\circ}}2\left[\sin 15^{\circ}+\sin (2x-15^{\circ})\right]=\sin (2x-15^{\circ})\cos\frac {x-45^{\circ}}2\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/b/5/7b5c9b37ce43cc999d04346d7d95afaa8c85d7e1.png)

![$\sin x\left[\cos\left(\frac {3x-15^{\circ}}2+\cos\frac {x-45^{\circ}}2\right)\right]=\sin (2x-15^{\circ})\cos\frac {x-45^{\circ} }2\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/9/0/19046874d4c66b7ddf042e6a84405c00b7f618a2.png)
![$\sin x\cos\frac {3x-15^{\circ}}2=\cos\frac {x-45^{\circ}}2\left[\sin (2x-15^{\circ})-\sin x\right]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/1/1/a1177682cded42ffc9f8c22b6011c7b25bd400ef.png)








Extension. Is well-known that






















PP14 (M.O. Sanchez). Let






Proof 1. Observe that
































PP15 (M.O. Sanchez). Let




Proof.
















This post has been edited 333 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Jul 30, 2016, 2:30 PM