392. Art of Problem Solving (geometry).
by Virgil Nicula, Mar 20, 2014, 10:50 PM
PP0. Prove that in
there is the chain
(standard notations).
Proof. Are well-known
The product of the inequalities
, i.e.
a.s.o.
, i.e.
from where obtain
. Applly 
In the inequality
for
obtain that
Since
get
, i.e.
. Otherwise. 
. Add
and
.
Remark.
I used the well-known identities
.
PP1. Let
be an interior point of the parallelogram
. Let the points
such that
and
. Prove that
, where
is the area of
.
Proof 1. Observe that
and
. Thus,
![$\odot\begin{array}{cccccccc}
\nearrow & BA\parallel EH & \implies & [BEH]=[AEH] & \implies & 2\cdot [BEH]=2\cdot [AEH] & \implies & \boxed{\ [BEHG]=2\cdot [AEH]\ }\\\\
\searrow & DA\parallel FH & \implies & [DFH]=[AFH] & \implies & 2\cdot [DFH]=2\cdot [AFH] & \implies & \boxed{\ [DFHI]=2\cdot [AFH]\ }\end{array}\ (3)\implies$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/1/7/a173a2665e6e4ac565b2558a0932a9bbc18d3b79.png)
.
Proof 2.
![$2\sigma +[ABEI]+[ADFG]+[CEHF]=2[ABCD]\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/f/6/df60576b7217cdbb09a6ca7c5652ed3deed35bb7.png)
![$2\sigma +[ADFG]=[ABCD]+[DIHF]\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/5/0/b50678ff2b585e04998dd672b997425c198e55c4.png)
.
PP2. Prove that in any triangle
exists the equivalence
(standard notations).
Proof 1. Let
and
, i.e.
.
Proof 2. Construct
so that
. Thus,
. Therefore,
.
PP3. Prove the Heron's formula (with more proofs)
the area
of the triangle
is given by
, where
(standard notations).
Proof 1 (classic). Denote the projection
of
on
. Suppose w.l.o.g. that
. Thus,


.
Remark. If denote
, then
and the formula
becomes
.
Thus,
and 
I used the relations
.
Proof 2. Is well-known that
. Let
, where
is the incircle and
is the
-excircle. So 
and
. In conclusion,
.
Proof 3. Is well-known that
. Let
, where
is the
-excircle and
is the
-excircle. Thus,
and
.
Proof 4.
a.s.o.

.
Proof 5. Let the orthocenter
and
. Suppose that
is acute. Then


Remark.

Otherwise,
, where
is the length of the circumradius.
PP4. Prove that in any triangle
there is the identity
, where
(standard notations). See and here.
Proof 1. Prove easily that
.
Indeed, let

Proof 2. Let incircle
,
-excircle
, circumcircle
and
. Thus,
and
. So
. Thus, 
. The sum of
.
Proof 3.

. Hence
i.e.
, where
.
Proof 4. Let incircle
circumcircle
. From
obtain
from
, where 
The relation
is obtained from the Ptolemy's theorem in the quadrilateral
, where

. Am folosit
.
Thus obtain
which is an interesting identity. Hence
and
.
Obtain
.
Remark. Can obtain
without the Ptolemy's theorem
let
and from
and
obtain
, adica relatia
a.s.o. Tot asa 
and O.K.
PP5.Prove that in
exists Euler's relation
.
Proof 1 (own). Let the midpoint
of
, the diameter
of the circumcircle
, where
and
separates
,
. Thus, the projection of
on
is
equally to
and the projection of
on
is equally to
, where
. Thus, 
. Thus, 

. In conclusion,
.
Proof 2 (classic). Let the midpoint
of
, the tangent point
of incircle
and diameter
of circumcircle
, where
and
separates
,
. Thus,
and

.
Proof 3 (classic). Is well-known that
. Hence

.
Proof 4. Apply the generalized Pythagoras' relation in

.
PP6. Let
be a right circular cone with radius
and generatrix
Prove that
if its volume is constant, then: its lateral surface is minimum iff
; its total surface is minimum iff
.
Proof. Denote the circle
from the base and the apex
with
. Thus,
and volume 
is constant, i.e.
is constant. Lateral surface area is
and total surface area is
.
is constant
is constant
is constant
. Thus,
is
is 
is
is
is
.
is constant
is constant
is constant
is constant
. Therefore,
is
is
is
.
PP7. Prove that for
exists Weitzenböck's inequality
.
Proof. Prove easily
.
Method
Since
we can apply Tchebyshev's
inequality
.
Method
I"ll apply inequality
, where
.
PP8.
Proof 1. Let
. Thus,
and 

.

.
Prove easily that
(
is circumcenter of
)
and
. Thus,
.
Proof 2 (metric).
Hence
.
Remark. Exist relations
.
Indeed,
. Since
.
Otherwise.
.
Remark.
PP9. Let
with incenter
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Apply the theorem of Sines in
.Thus, 

. Define over
an equivalence relation
, i.e.
and
have same signature. Observe that
and 
. Hence
, i.e.
.
PP10. Let
with circumradius
and inradius
. Prove that
.
Proof.
and
. Suppose that
and
. Thus,

or
and
.
Contraexample.
, where
and
.
Remark.

. In this case 
PP11. Let
with the circumcircle
, incircle
-excircle
and
so that
and
. Prove that
.
Proof.
.
Thus,
. From the
-right
obtain that
.
Otherwise.
.
PP12. Let
and
fot which
and
, where
. Prove that Stewart's relation
.
Proof. I"ll use property:
. Let
and suppose w.l.o.g.
, where
.
Thus,

.
PP13. Prove that a plane which pass through midpoints of two opposite edges of a tetrahedron cut the tetrahedron in two solids with same volume.
Proof. Let midpoints
of
respectively. Suppose the plane
cut
in
and
in
. Appear two cases:
are midpoints of
,
respectively and
. Let midpoint
of
and volume
of
. Observe that
is a prism. Its volum is
![$\frac vV=\frac {v[AMPRMQ]}V+$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/6/9/b696857565332f6163670e17adfe67defba642ec.png)
![$\frac {v[RPCN]}V=$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/0/5/b05220d8de12b3d22937165aeed8bca94c1e1817.png)
.
. Let
and with Menelaus' theorem prove easily
. suppose w.l.o.g.
, adica
si
. Required volume is
and ![$\frac vV=\frac {v[RMAQ]}V-\frac {v[RPCN]}V=$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/1/0/a109199220d21d96a8d9a3232e5a7dc0a51d65fc.png)
.
PP14. Let
with incenter
, centroid
and orthocentre
. Prove that
.
Proof. Choose the origin
of the vectorial system. Thus,
,
and
,
. We know that
,
and
. Apply the theorem of
- median in

. Thus,

. So,
.
Thus
, i.e. 
PP15. Let
with incircle
. Prove that
.
Proof. Let
so that
. Prove easily that
, i.e.
is an
-right isosceles and
is the circumcenter of
. Thus,
and 
. Shortly,
.
Remark.
there is the chain of the equalities
.
PP16. The point
is a midpoint of
. Circle
which passes through
and
intersect circle
which passes through
and
in two different points
and
.
Point
is midpoint of arc
of circle
which doesn't contain
. Point
is a midpoint of arc
of circle
which doesn't contain
. Prove that
.
Here is a short metrical proof.
Lemma. Let
with circumcircle
and middlepoint
of the arc
which doesn't contain vertex
. Then exists relation 
Proof 1. Let
. Thus,
and
.
Thus,
Therefore, 
Proof 2. In
have
and
. Thus,

Remark. If denote the middlepoint
of the arc
which contains the vertex
, then there is and the relation
because 
In the proof of the lemma I used the relation
and theorem of the Sinus.
Proof 3. Let
and incircle
. Hence


Remark.. I denoted the power
of
w.r.t. circumcircle and I used the relations:
,
,
,
(from
),
and 
Proof 4.
![$\frac{bc\left[(b+c)^2-a^2\right]}{4p(p-a)}=bc\ .$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/3/b/83be30acf951a6267879504a29b376f731df0b4a.png)
Remark. I used the relations
,
and 
Proof of the proposed problem. Apply the above lemma for
and

and
. But
. Thus,

PP17 (Gustavo Jimmy Garcia Paytan). Let
-right
with
-excircle
and
-excircle
incircles
and
of
and
respectively. Let
of
and
. Prove that
.
Proof.

and
are cyclic and
, i.e.
Since 
and
The relations
and
implies relation 
Remark. Otherwise can apply the well-known identities in
.
PP18. Let
and an its interior
so that
and
. Prove that
and
.
Proof. Let
and
. So
. Thus,
and 
. Hence

is equilateral
and
.
PP19. Let
and for
let the cevian
, where
. Prove that
.
Proof. Let
Is well-known that the division
is harmonically, i.e.
and
.
Let
. Thus,

![$\frac {[BDF]}{[DFP]}=1+2\cdot \frac {[BDF]}{[DEF]}\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/e/1/be1134fa290153ccee63db458a648fc01d2e540d.png)
what is the relation
. Otherwise. 
what is the relation
. See here


Proof. Are well-known








![$ \sqrt[3]{p-a)(p-b)(p-c)}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/8/b/78beb285b6aa8fd05b42fb1a35da74648251a9e3.png)

![$ p\ge 3\sqrt[3]{pr^2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/4/8/9487fe71b62bb208ba3731d1f3b3508811bf4d18.png)





![$ 3p(p-a)(p-b)(p-c)\le \left[r(4R+r)\right]^2$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/e/0/de05838d17b91050bf692b381dac3961a7c64cb1.png)













Remark.





PP1. Let





![$[BGHIDC]=2\cdot [AEF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/4/e/d4ee31483e0a94a455ee1435654d2d63e799fde4.png)
![$[XYZ]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/7/6/c7608a3e97e44fc5bcf0cd62a1f7dfc0a0a2e7d4.png)

Proof 1. Observe that
![$\boxed{\ [AEF]=[EFH]+[AEH]+[AFH]\ }\ (1)$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/9/f/89f80199751ebfa1e6b601c7036e1ccb47c43a81.png)
![$\boxed{\ [CEHF]=2\cdot [EFH]\ }\ (2)$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/7/9/4794bcd4f7da3be72c602b660ad1c16326fed0c9.png)
![$\odot\begin{array}{cccccccc}
\nearrow & BA\parallel EH & \implies & [BEH]=[AEH] & \implies & 2\cdot [BEH]=2\cdot [AEH] & \implies & \boxed{\ [BEHG]=2\cdot [AEH]\ }\\\\
\searrow & DA\parallel FH & \implies & [DFH]=[AFH] & \implies & 2\cdot [DFH]=2\cdot [AFH] & \implies & \boxed{\ [DFHI]=2\cdot [AFH]\ }\end{array}\ (3)\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/1/7/a173a2665e6e4ac565b2558a0932a9bbc18d3b79.png)
![$[BGHIDC]=[CEHF]+[BEHG]+$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/f/c/7fcbc887101394743b365e158b849640093c3864.png)
![$[DFHI]\ \stackrel{(2\wedge 3)}{=}\ 2\cdot [EFH]+2\cdot [AEH]+2\cdot [AFH]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/0/9/b0906af01b497700105aab6cf8bb30c448a90667.png)
![$2\cdot ([EFH]+[AEH]+[AFH])\stackrel{(1)}{=}\ 2\cdot [AEF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/5/5/455ca3d07b0de2cf3e1e2819c6689acb2b86b50c.png)
Proof 2.
![$\sigma\equiv [AEF]\ \implies\ [AEF]+[ABE]+[ADF]+[CEF]=[ABCD]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/e/c/6eca9a7387e88afacb8a35cad36827fcb0fbeb70.png)
![$2\sigma +[ABEI]+[ADFG]+[CEHF]=2[ABCD]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/f/6/df60576b7217cdbb09a6ca7c5652ed3deed35bb7.png)
![$2\sigma +[ABEI]+[ADFG]+[CEHF]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/b/9/cb979984528f5dd7e4843b8098fcbf2978647f90.png)
![$[ABCD]+([ABEI]+[CEHF]+[DIHF])\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/d/8/4d84bf517518a3ef12bc05e460ea5985e4568855.png)
![$2\sigma +[ADFG]=[ABCD]+[DIHF]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/5/0/b50678ff2b585e04998dd672b997425c198e55c4.png)
![$2\sigma =[BCFG]+[DIHF]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/c/0/fc0e3fa94111e8e707fcc6aef99b69cf74e4baa5.png)
![$2\sigma =[BGHIDC]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/8/2/d82c35710a15dac8eb3a163e9444cbf7622ab396.png)
![$[BGHIDC]=2\cdot [AEF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/4/e/d4ee31483e0a94a455ee1435654d2d63e799fde4.png)
PP2. Prove that in any triangle


Proof 1. Let






Proof 2. Construct













PP3. Prove the Heron's formula (with more proofs)





Proof 1 (classic). Denote the projection















![$16S^2=\left[(a+c)^2-b^2\right]\left[b^2-(a-c)^2\right]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/f/2/ef2be6da9fd53b9a0a6e08d5b0672debc1e98182.png)

Remark. If denote




Thus,






Proof 2. Is well-known that






and






Proof 3. Is well-known that












Proof 4.




![$16S^2=\sum\left[a^4-\left(b^2-c^2\right)^2\right]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/3/9/b3953df333e16f332eb5a6fb52d7a7a51032581b.png)

Proof 5. Let the orthocenter



![$2S=\sum 2[BHC]=\sum aHD=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/5/8/458b9c4d7482cdd8b145707c4d84c737c030d33e.png)






Remark.








![$S=\sum [BOC]=\frac R2\cdot \sum a\cos A\implies \sum a\cos A=\frac {2S}{R}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/1/3/1131aa3c97144e7294d64def82e3f26ea32f10a3.png)

PP4. Prove that in any triangle



Proof 1. Prove easily that

Indeed, let





Proof 2. Let incircle














Proof 3.









Proof 4. Let incircle






The relation













Thus obtain






Obtain





Remark. Can obtain













![$s^2=\sum\left[a^2-(s-a)^2\right]\Longleftrightarrow$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/b/2/db29b55a8def1933ca3e4273a2872bc4634fb74f.png)


PP5.Prove that in


Proof 1 (own). Let the midpoint

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
![$[NS]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/0/d/80de18ed66832d94ce5323f567fc5b59dc992316.png)





![$[OI]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/e/6/1e6d88a33008d2bd15b8d0f7de4ff31d77c52d0f.png)

equally to

![$[OI]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/e/6/1e6d88a33008d2bd15b8d0f7de4ff31d77c52d0f.png)











![$\frac {(s-b)(s-c)[(s-a)+a]}{s}-(s-b)(s-c)=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/f/d/1fd6b1e150deab25628e2e6fa0b3b672ba93581c.png)


Proof 2 (classic). Let the midpoint

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)


![$[NS]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/0/d/80de18ed66832d94ce5323f567fc5b59dc992316.png)













Proof 3 (classic). Is well-known that







![$\frac {2Rr[(b+c-a)+a]}{b+c}=2Rr\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/e/7/ee71374923d378847051b168dd9129add4ba9919.png)


Proof 4. Apply the generalized Pythagoras' relation in








PP6. Let



if its volume is constant, then: its lateral surface is minimum iff


Proof. Denote the circle





is constant, i.e.
































PP7. Prove that for


Proof. Prove easily



Method



inequality




Method



PP8.

Proof 1. Let





















and



Proof 2 (metric).



Remark. Exist relations

Indeed,





Otherwise.





Remark.

PP9. Let




Proof 1. Apply the theorem of Sines in
















PP10. Let




Proof.
















Contraexample.



Remark.






PP11. Let









Proof.


Thus,





Otherwise.





PP12. Let






Proof. I"ll use property:




Thus,






PP13. Prove that a plane which pass through midpoints of two opposite edges of a tetrahedron cut the tetrahedron in two solids with same volume.
Proof. Let midpoints


![$[AB],$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/8/e/58e377d741d6612acac694994b20fa626c18e0ce.png)
![$[CD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/7/0/e70960e9e5738a46ad23f794e796ef3cb4ad7e2c.png)

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)

![$[AD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/3/0f3e4c424371b27673db323ced8ef0777940c0d4.png)



![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
![$[AD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/3/0f3e4c424371b27673db323ced8ef0777940c0d4.png)


![$[AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/9/3/0936990e6625d65357ca51006c08c9fe3e04ba0c.png)



![$v=v[AMPCNQ]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/0/f/70fb027d7fed244082056a7abed425092d3dad20.png)
![$v[AMPRNQ]+v[RPCN]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/2/c/b2c745bde7430f378eddc1b35c9ab8592d5b4ad4.png)
![$\frac vV=\frac {v[AMPRMQ]}V+$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/6/9/b696857565332f6163670e17adfe67defba642ec.png)
![$\frac {v[RPCN]}V=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/0/5/b05220d8de12b3d22937165aeed8bca94c1e1817.png)
![$\frac {[AMQ]\cdot \delta_{(ABD)}(R)}{[ABD]\cdot \delta _{(ABD)}(C)}+$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/1/6/5160d7e833a241bb2e34aad37cb5214081d5da9f.png)
![$\frac {[PCN]\cdot\delta_{(PCN)}(R)}{[BCD]\cdot\delta_{(BCD)}(A)}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/5/e/95ebf925c21fad0fe19b161b0a46914d6ee54be0.png)
![$\frac {[AMQ]}{[ABD]}\cdot \frac {RA}{CA}+$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/2/2/e2291fa139f17e200ec26d129173cadffe2e39f1.png)
![$\frac {[PCN]}{[BCD]}\cdot \frac {RC}{AC}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/b/5/2b533befae8287266532035531cb2f7b6c6b69cf.png)








![$v=v[AMPCNQ]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/0/f/70fb027d7fed244082056a7abed425092d3dad20.png)
![$v[RMAQ]-v[RPCN]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/0/b/70bc54866933d1653a48f7bd3888326a359286b6.png)
![$\frac vV=\frac {v[RMAQ]}V-\frac {v[RPCN]}V=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/1/0/a109199220d21d96a8d9a3232e5a7dc0a51d65fc.png)
![$\frac {[AMQ]\cdot\delta_{(ABD)}(R)}{[ABD]\cdot\delta_{(ABD)}(C)}-\frac {[PCN]\cdot\delta_{(BCD)}(R)}{[BCD]\cdot\delta_{(BCD)}(A)}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/2/4/324677002f24f54bcb8faf02bf8b41f35d1c4437.png)



PP14. Let





Proof. Choose the origin





















![$\frac{1}{3}\left[(R-2r)^{2}-(R^{2}-2Rr)\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/e/8/4e896d6270aa63a276989234b0d575795c30a020.png)


Thus




PP15. Let





Proof. Let












Remark.


PP16. The point










Point









Here is a short metrical proof.
Lemma. Let






Proof 1. Let





Thus,





Proof 2. In




![$4R^2\left[\sin^2\left(B+\frac A2\right)-\sin^2\frac A2\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/b/d/5bd74212f4cb1af130a164224f6012f666508811.png)

Remark. If denote the middlepoint








Proof 3. Let











Remark.. I denoted the power









Proof 4.


![$\frac{bc\left[(b+c)^2-a^2\right]}{4p(p-a)}=bc\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/3/b/83be30acf951a6267879504a29b376f731df0b4a.png)
Remark. I used the relations



Proof of the proposed problem. Apply the above lemma for




and




PP17 (Gustavo Jimmy Garcia Paytan). Let














Proof.









and









Remark. Otherwise can apply the well-known identities in


PP18. Let






Proof. Let















PP19. Let




![$\frac 1{[BDF]}+\frac 2{[DEF]}=\frac 1{[DEFP]}+\frac 2{[BDPF]}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/3/2/332d25aa9c54c1df9a36529a4ffdaf5467d7782b.png)
Proof. Let




Let
![$\left\{\begin{array}{ccc}
b & = & [BDF]\\\\
m & = & [DEF]\\\\
s & = & [DFP]\end{array}\right\|$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/a/e/3ae190f2d7678ccd43ee4be45b6e08543736d404.png)
![$\frac 1{[BDF]}+\frac 2{[DEF]}=\frac 1{[DEFP]}+\frac 2{[BDPF]}\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/d/d/8ddc5d24b779e5a96769b24a039f73324ccae40e.png)




![$\frac {[BDF]}{[DFP]}=1+2\cdot \frac {[BDF]}{[DEF]}\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/e/1/be1134fa290153ccee63db458a648fc01d2e540d.png)









This post has been edited 284 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Jun 28, 2017, 5:39 AM