10. Walker's inequality and its extension.
by Virgil Nicula, Apr 20, 2010, 12:58 AM
Walker's inequality. Prove that in any acute or right triangle exists the inequality
.
Method 1 (own).

. I used the well-known identities
and
.
Remark.
and
(Euler's relation in an acute triangle) 
. I denote
- the distance of the circumcenter
of
to the sideline
.
Method 2. Denote the projections
,
and
of the orthocenter
on the sidelines
,
and
respectively. Thus, 
.
I used well-known relations
a.s.o. and
a.s.o. See here the Cezar Lupu's article.
Remark. In an acute triangle
there are the inequalities
.
Can obtain the second inequality with the well-known metrical relation
.
Lemma. In any triangle
with incenter
the following inequality holds :
.
Proof. Show easily that
a.s.o. Thus, we have :

The last inequality is due to Gerretsen i.e.
. Therefore, we have shown that :
.[/quote]
Method 3 (M.C.). For an acute triangle
denote
its orthocenter and let
,
,
be its altitudes . Thus,
is the incenter of the orthic triangle
.
Applying the upper lemma for
we have :
, where
and
are the circumradius and inradius of
.
Taking into account that
and
, the last inequality becomes : 

Walker's inequality .
Remark. In the above proof I used the well-known relations
and
(in an acute triangle) .
Extension of the Walker's inequality (see here).
Proof. For the point
denote
,
,
. Since 
a.s.o. obtain that
![$ \left[\sum (y + z)\cdot AD\right]^2\le \sum (y + z)\cdot\sum (y + z)\cdot AD^2 = 2\cdot\sum (y + z)\cdot AD^2 =$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/1/a/61a68346b194f8c8d1cbc154cc7357e9655204fe.png)
. In conclusion
with equality iff
.
Particular cases.
.
.
.

Method 1 (own).








Remark.








Method 2. Denote the projections









![$3-\sum\frac {[BHC]}{[ABC]}=3-1=2$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/1/d/81dee2e8caa6e2bf4af9b94ca3890af98fd89def.png)



I used well-known relations


Remark. In an acute triangle


Can obtain the second inequality with the well-known metrical relation

Lemma. In any triangle



Proof. Show easily that



The last inequality is due to Gerretsen i.e.


Method 3 (M.C.). For an acute triangle







Applying the upper lemma for





Taking into account that







Remark. In the above proof I used the well-known relations


Extension of the Walker's inequality (see here).
Quote:
Let
be an interior point of the triangle
with the barycentrical coordinates
w.r.t. 
. Then there is an inequality
.






Proof. For the point





a.s.o. obtain that

![$ \left[\sum (y + z)\cdot AD\right]^2\le \sum (y + z)\cdot\sum (y + z)\cdot AD^2 = 2\cdot\sum (y + z)\cdot AD^2 =$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/1/a/61a68346b194f8c8d1cbc154cc7357e9655204fe.png)




Particular cases.




This post has been edited 13 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Nov 22, 2015, 10:01 PM