308. Some nice and easy properties in a triangle.
by Virgil Nicula, Aug 8, 2011, 2:10 AM
PP1. Let an acute
with orthocenter
. Let midpoints
,
of
,
. Prove that
is radical axis of circles with diameters
,
.
Let the circles
with diameters
,
, where
,
are the midpoints of
,
. Let
and the power
of
w.r.t.
.
Proof 1.
,
and 
. Thus,
and
belong to the radical axis of
,
, i.e.
is the radical axis of
, 
Proof 2.

. Prove analogously that
.
Since
obtain that
belongs to the radical axis of
. On the other side

. Prove analogously that
. Since
obtain that
belongs to the radical axis of
,
. Thus,
is the radical axis of
,
.
An easy extension. In
let
and
so that
and 
is cyclically. Let
. Prove that
is the radical axis of the circumcircles for
and
.
Proof. Denote the circumcircles
,
of
,
and the circumcircle
of
. Observe that

. Thus,
is the radical center of
,
and
. Particularly,
belongs to the radical axis of
and
. Let 
and the common ratio
. Thus,
. In conclusion,
and
belong
to the radical axis of the circles
,
, i.e. the line
is the radical axis of the circles
,
.
PP2 (Cono Sur M.O. - 2007). Let
be an acute triangle with the orthocenter
and the orthic triangle
, where
,
,
.
Denote midpoint
of
, the circumcircle
of
,
,
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (synthetic - Sunken Rock). Denote the diameter
in the circumcircle
of
and the reflection
of
about the midpoint
of
. Observe that
is evidently a parallelogram, the quadrilateral
is cyclically, where
ia a diameter of its circumcircle. Since
and
are isogonal w.r.t.
obtain that
is a parallelogram as well. So
. From

. With relation
obtain that
. Similarly, from
. So the quadrilateral
is cyclically, but
is cyclic as well. Hence
.
Proof 2 (metric). Prove easily that
and
are the tangents from the point
to the circle
and
. From the power
of
w.r.t.
obtain that 
i.e.
and
.Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversal
and
. Denote the point
for which
.
Observe that
. Therefore,
.
In conclusion, from the relations
and
obtain that
.
PP3. Let
with circumcircle
. Its bisectors meet again
in
,
,
, i.e. its
incenter
. Prove that
.
Proof. I"ll use the well-known relations
. Thus,

, where
is the area of
. So
.
Remark.
. Using C.B.S. - inequality obtain that
, i.e.
.
PP4. Let
be the centroid of
and
the symmedian point. Show that
.
Proof. Denote the midpoint
of the side
and
. Is well-known that
. Apply van Aubel's relation to
.
Denote
. Apply the Sinus' theorem to the triangles 
a.s.o.
.
PP5. Let
with circumcircle
. Let
, the midpoint
of
and
,
. Prove that
(V.N.).
Proof.


PP6. Let an isosceles
with
and a mobile
so that
. Let the incircle 
of
and the
-excircle
of
. Prove that the sum
is constant.
Proof. Denote the incircle
of
and the tangent points
. Observe that
. Thus,

(constant)..
An easy extension. Let
and a line
so that
and
. Denote
the inradius
of
and the
-exradius
of
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Let the incircle
of
, the incircle
of
, the
-excircle
of
and the
tangent points
. Thus,
.
In conclusion,

. Remark that
.
Proof 2. The incircle
of
touches its sides in
. The
- exincircle
of
touches its sidelines in
. Denote
,
. Thus,
,
and

. From the relation
obtain
, i.e.
. From the right
obtain
, i.e.
. From the right triangle
obtain
, i.e.
. Adding 
and using
obtain

.
PP7. Let
be the incenter of
and let
be the
-exincircle which touches
at
. If
meets
again at
, then prove that
bisects
.
Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.
. Denote
for which
and
so that
,
are harmonical conjugate w.r.t the pair
, i.e.
. Prove
easily that
and
. Observe that


. Thus, from
,
results that
, i.e.
is cyclic. Thus,
, i.e. the ray
bisects the angle
because the division
is harmonically.
Remark. I used the power
of
w.r.t.
. If the circle
touches
,
on
,
respectively, then
. Indeed, apply the Menelaus' theorem to
the transversal
and
, what is truly.
PP8. Let
be the points that divide the side
into
equal segments such that
and also let
.
Similarly we define
and
, where
as well as
and
. With the mentioned notations, we will prove that :
.
Proof. Apply the Stewart's theorem to the cevian
in the triangle
for any
. Since
, so 
![$\frac {b^2}{n+1}\cdot \frac {n(n+1)}{2}+\frac {c^2}{n+1}\cdot \left[n(n+1)-\frac {n(n+1)}{2}\right]\implies$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/8/c/f8c701cb632904339c6aa96b553867700a6d41d9.png)
. In conclusion, from the relation
obtain that
.
PP9. Let
be a triangle with the circumcircle
. The
-symmedian of
meet again the circle
at
. Denote the midpoint
of
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote the midpoints
,
,
of
,
,
respectively and the intersection
.
Thus,
.
An easy extension. Let
be a triangle with the circumcircle
. Consider two points
so that
and
. Denote
and the points
so that
. Denote
. Prove that
and
.
PP10. Let
be an acute triangle with the circumcircle
and the orthocenter
. Denote the diameter
of circle
, the point
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (luisgeometria, nice). Denote the reflections
,
of
,
w.r.t.
,
respectively, i.e.
and
are the perpendicular bisectors of ![$[KU]$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/5/2/d527ee5bff587ff3e2aed0103f41b2175e7a4a16.png)
and
respectively. The linee
is the common tangent of the circles
and
is their radical axis 
is a cyclical quadrilateral with circumcenter
as desired.
Proof 2 (metric).
is right

(symmetrically w.r.t.
,
). In conclusion,
.
Proof 3 (metric).
is a parallelogram
. Thus,

.
Proof 4 (trigonometric).
and


(symmetrically w.r.t.
,
). In conclusion,
.
PP11.
is an equilateral triangle and
is a line tangent to its circumcircle
. Let the distances from
,
,
onto
be
,
,
. Prove that one of the values
,
,
equals the sum of the other two.
Proof. Suppose that
is tangent to
at
and
is the antipode of
. If
, where
, then
and
, i.e.
. So 
So
. So from the Pompeiu's theorem the result follows. Apply the Ptolemy's theorem to the cyclical
and obtain that one of the values
,
,
is equally to
the sum of the other two, i.e. one of the values
,
,
is equally to the sum of the other two.
PP12. Let
with the incircle
and the
-exincircle
. The circle
touches
in
,
and
.
Denote
,
,
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
, i.e.
and
. Prove easily that

. Remark. Denote
and
. Prove analogously that
.
PP13. Let
be the center of the rectangle
inscribed in acute triangle
with
and
,
so that
(constant).
The points
and
are defined in a similar way for inscribed rectangles with two vertices on
and
respectively. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Let
and
. Thus,
,
and

. Get analogously that
and
. Apply the Ceva's theorem
to the cevians
,
,
and obtain
, i.e.
.
Proof 2. Let
,
,
and
. Thus,
(constant),
,
,
and
. Thus,
a.s.o.
PP14. Let an acute
with orthocentre
and circumcircle
so that
. For
define
. Prove that
.
Remark. For
obtain the Yasinsky's problem P414 from "Words of mathematics" (see here).
Proof. Let
and
,
. Thus,
and
and
. Thus,
, i.e.
. Hence
.
Lemma. Let
with
, the median
and the bisector
, where
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Let
and prove easily that
. Apply an well-known property to the ray
in the triangle

. Prove easily that
.
Indeed,
. Thus,
.
Proof 2 (similar). Let
and prove easily that
. Apply an well-known property to the ray
in

.
PP15. Give
, medians
,
and bisector of
. The line passing
which perpendicular with
meet
,
at
,
. The line pasing through
which perpendicular with
meet
at
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (metric). Suppose w.l.o.g.
and denote
,
and the projections
,
of
,
on
. Observe that

and
. Thus,
.
Analogously

. Thus,

(see here).
Remark. Let
and Menelaus' theorem to
.
Proof 2. Menelaus' theorem to
. Let
. Thus,
, what is true.
PP16. Let an
-isosceles
and a mobile
so that
. Let
be inradius of
and let
be
-exradius of
. Prove that the sum
is constant.
Proof. Apply the Stewart's relation to the cevian
in
.
Let the midpoint
of
,
,
- the length of the inradius for
and
- the length of the
-exradius for
. Therefore,


.
Remark. Other proof of the relation

.Observe that an interesting property: if
is the length of the inradius for
and
is the length of the
-exradius for
,
then
. Its proof is symmetrically w.r.t.
and
.
PP17. Let
with circumcircle
and the exincircle
. Let the feet
,
of bisectors from
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Suppose w.l.o.g.
and denote
,
.

. I used the identity
.
. Denote
so that
. Therefore, 
, what is well
known or can show easily. Indeed,

.
Proof 2. Suppose w.l.o.g.
. Is well-known the equivalence
.
![$I_aF^2-I_aE^2=\frac {abc(b-c)\left[a^2+2a(b+c)+\left(b^2+bc+c^2\right)\right]}{(a+b)^2(a+c)^2}$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/6/9/d69e54182297e7142d47fbc5b761e517dba7fe84.png)
![$\frac {abc\left[b(a+b)^2-c(a+c)^2\right]}{(a+b)^2(a+c)^2}=\implies$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/9/7/497c1fa248a48448d4e6648872979515b66b1259.png)
. So
.
Lemma. Let
be a triangle with the orthocenter
, the circumcircle
and the orthic triangle
, where
.
Denote
. Then
, where
is the orthic axis of
and
, i.e. the Euler's line
is perpendicular on the orthic axis.
Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.
. Thuse,
. Thus,



, what is a symmetrical form w.r.t.
Thus,
, i.e.
and
.
Proof 3 (synthetic). Observe that for the triangle
we have:
is its orthic triangle;
is its orthic axis;
is its Euler's line. In conclusion,
.
PP18. Let
with
, its incenter
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (metric - own). I"ll use the well-known property:
. Thus,
, where
. Hence
. Observe that
and
. Apply the property
to 


, what is truly.
Proof 2 (Sunken Rock).
will intersect the arc
of the circle
at
,
the arc
at
,
will intersect
at
and
at
. Next take
as symmetrical of 
about
and
the symmetrical of
about
.
and
being the midpoints of the arcs
and
respectively, it's easy to see that a
rotation around
will map
to
and
to 
so
, similarly
(actually, the triangles
and
are equilateral). It's also easy to see that
and
are cyclic and, as previously mentioned
since the two triangles are equilateral, we shall easily get
and
. We have also
. From all these we get
and
. From the two cyclic quads we shall get that
, and from their similarity:
. From
,
and
we get
, i.e.
. If
and
, from
- midpoint of
and
- midpoint of
we get
, hence
. Last, seeing
for instance, that
(s.a.s.), we get the required angle equality as well. Even easier using the above proof, one can show the following:
.




![$[AC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/9/3/0936990e6625d65357ca51006c08c9fe3e04ba0c.png)
![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)

![$[BE]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/b/0/fb061a8a7c5f9403b5f9261840de9dfea7cb68cf.png)
![$[CF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/1/b/21bdd766ec1757878aeae83d55b7ab5917af4537.png)
Let the circles

![$[BE]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/b/0/fb061a8a7c5f9403b5f9261840de9dfea7cb68cf.png)
![$[CF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/1/b/21bdd766ec1757878aeae83d55b7ab5917af4537.png)


![$[BE]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/b/0/fb061a8a7c5f9403b5f9261840de9dfea7cb68cf.png)
![$[CF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/1/b/21bdd766ec1757878aeae83d55b7ab5917af4537.png)




Proof 1.














Proof 2.


![$2\left[HB^2+HN^2-\left(m_b^2-NE^2\right)\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/1/e/31e04d66de7804abd66efb5f910b7238841b4858.png)

![$2\left[\left(HB+HN\right)^2-2\cdot HB\cdot HN-BN^2\right]=-4\cdot HB\cdot HN\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/8/a/18a48d1ea11cd1e02881dee7ec620151e477bd8a.png)


Since
















An easy extension. In





is cyclically. Let




Proof. Denote the circumcircles

















and the common ratio






to the radical axis of the circles





PP2 (Cono Sur M.O. - 2007). Let






Denote midpoint

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)






Proof 1 (synthetic - Sunken Rock). Denote the diameter
![$[AS]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/1/f/81f842d87b22553e4b674bb2bf46a080da785009.png)





![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
































Proof 2 (metric). Prove easily that









i.e.













Observe that






In conclusion, from the relations



PP3. Let






incenter

![$\frac{1}{[BA'C]}+\frac{1}{[CB'A]}+\frac{1}{[AC'B]} \ge\ \frac{9}{[ABC]}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/6/d/96d02f33e90deaec3e8da746587ed6969b3d9a81.png)
Proof. I"ll use the well-known relations
![$\left\{\begin{array}{cc}
[BA'C]=\frac {ra^2}{4(s-a)} & (1)\\\\
\sum a^2(s-a)=4sr(R+r) & (2)\\\\
\frac {s^2}{r}\ge 16R-5r\ge 9(R+r) & (3)\end{array}\right|$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/c/a/dca65014eb6824913333ec446c99b0f2d5f8a2fb.png)
![$\sum\frac {1}{[BA'C]}\ \stackrel{(1)}{=}\ \frac 4r$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/c/a/fcac25a45750ac4c1af936d3a84584bc2d8fb04a.png)









![$S=[ABC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/3/a/b3ae3d445111e4dd28be75922309d3270079368c.png)

![$\boxed{\ \sum\frac {1}{[BA'C]}\ \ge\ \ \left(1+\frac 79\cdot\frac {R-2r}{R+r}\right)\cdot\frac {9}{[ABC]}\ \ge\ \frac {9}{[ABC]}\ }$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/b/5/7b558a206f28f5daf9ed2eddeb508b952827d83f.png)
Remark.



PP4. Let




Proof. Denote the midpoint

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)



Denote










PP5. Let




![$[AP]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/6/2/f6235de9bde9e47652ee5f3cfbad1a2666873220.png)



Proof.








PP6. Let an isosceles





of





Proof. Denote the incircle










An easy extension. Let




the inradius






Proof 1. Let the incircle







tangent points




In conclusion,









Proof 2. The incircle

























and using







PP7. Let











Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.








easily that











![$\frac {r^2}{(s-a)^2}\cdot\left\{(s-a)^2+s^2-\left[s-(s-a)\right]^2\right\}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/8/5/385f62d8be704f18e932a5cb932b37f4de68da68.png)












Remark. I used the power









the transversal





PP8. Let

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)



Similarly we define






Proof. Apply the Stewart's theorem to the cevian







![$-\frac {a^2}{(n+1)^2}\cdot\left[\frac {n(n+1)^2}{2}-\frac {n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}\right]+$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/0/e/70e187930eccd6ad1b2c7896e2d220d73b2d7d87.png)
![$\frac {b^2}{n+1}\cdot \frac {n(n+1)}{2}+\frac {c^2}{n+1}\cdot \left[n(n+1)-\frac {n(n+1)}{2}\right]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/8/c/f8c701cb632904339c6aa96b553867700a6d41d9.png)
![$\Gamma_a=-\frac {na^2}{n+1}\cdot\left[\frac {n+1}{2}-\frac {2n+1}{6}\right]+$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/9/0/4902aeb386c820bef1f727c923618766ea88426b.png)
![$b^2\cdot \frac {n}{2}+c^2\cdot \left[n-\frac {n}{2}\right]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/a/b/1ab92d943e53355802af09859b2273f612436b6f.png)



PP9. Let







![$[AD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/3/0f3e4c424371b27673db323ced8ef0777940c0d4.png)

Proof. Denote the midpoints



![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
![$[CA]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/5/c/45c1acd47628de406680d04c09fe6314c3847acf.png)
![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)

Thus,


An easy extension. Let











PP10. Let



![$[AS]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/1/f/81f842d87b22553e4b674bb2bf46a080da785009.png)




Proof 1 (luisgeometria, nice). Denote the reflections








![$[KU]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/5/2/d527ee5bff587ff3e2aed0103f41b2175e7a4a16.png)
and
![$[LV]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/4/1/c41bc3960bcdfb732766c88321250501105a9a57.png)














Proof 2 (metric).









Proof 3 (metric).









Proof 4 (trigonometric).





![$4R^2\cdot \left[1-\sin^2C\left(1-\cos^2B\right)\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/1/8/d185bc1b1f0452553579461e4e8655b4162719f3.png)







PP11.













Proof. Suppose that











So





the sum of the other two, i.e. one of the values



PP12. Let









Denote





Proof. Denote










PP13. Let







The points





Proof 1. Let






![$\frac {[ARA_1]}{[APA_1]}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/b/9/2b9056ef9a2e82a64b8a3d089328602ed669436c.png)






to the cevians






Proof 2. Let

















PP14. Let an acute







Remark. For

Proof. Let


















Lemma. Let






Proof 1. Let


















Indeed,





Proof 2 (similar). Let















PP15. Give















Proof 1 (metric). Suppose w.l.o.g.










and









Analogously


















Remark. Let





Proof 2. Menelaus' theorem to











PP16. Let an










Proof. Apply the Stewart's relation to the cevian



Let the midpoint

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)


















Remark. Other proof of the relation









then



PP17. Let








Proof 1. Suppose w.l.o.g.





















known or can show easily. Indeed,







Proof 2. Suppose w.l.o.g.




![$I_aF^2-I_aE^2=\frac {abc(b-c)\left[a^2+2a(b+c)+\left(b^2+bc+c^2\right)\right]}{(a+b)^2(a+c)^2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/6/9/d69e54182297e7142d47fbc5b761e517dba7fe84.png)



![$\frac {abc\left[b(a+b)^2-c(a+c)^2\right]}{(a+b)^2(a+c)^2}=\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/9/7/497c1fa248a48448d4e6648872979515b66b1259.png)
![$OF^2-OE^2=\frac {abc(b-c)\left[a^2+2a(b+c)+\left(b^2+bc+c^2\right)\right]}{(a+b)^2(a+c)^2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/0/7/107249c8a76908247db710a7db27247014818fb0.png)


![$\stackrel{(1\wedge 2)}{=}\frac {abc(b-c)\left[a^2+2a(b+c)+\left(b^2+bc+c^2\right)\right]}{(a+b)^2(a+c)^2}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/9/c/29c6981c899f0bbb599714dfa7fc0ced1c4e7180.png)


Lemma. Let





Denote






Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g.

















Proof 3 (synthetic). Observe that for the triangle





PP18. Let





Proof 1 (metric - own). I"ll use the well-known property:




















![$3c(b+c)=[b+(a+c)][b+(2c-a)]\stackrel{(1)}{\iff}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/f/6/8f6871305ff5ad797ef4591cfbd28a5d0bcd5731.png)


Proof 2 (Sunken Rock).














about














so






since the two triangles are equilateral, we shall easily get




















for instance, that


This post has been edited 253 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Nov 20, 2015, 2:40 PM