413. Geometry 6.
by Virgil Nicula, Mar 21, 2015, 1:43 PM
PP2. Let
and the points
Suppose that there are
so that
Prove that
Proof. Let
Thus
is constant,
i.e.
the expression
is constant. Notam
Hence,


Extension. Let
and
Suppose that there are
so that
Prove that 
PP3 (O.I.M. - 2012). Let
with
and
, where
. For
define
and
. Show that
(Josef Tkadlec, Czech).
Proof (metrical). Denote
and
,
where
. Thus,

. Denote
and apply the Stewart's relation to the the cevians
,
in the triangle 




Hence
. Apply the Ceva's theorem to
and

is the foot of the
-bisector in
, i.e.
the line
pass by a fixed point
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the mentioned transversals 
.
Remark.
.
An easy extension. Let an acute
with
and
. Define 
and
. Show that
and
.
PP4. Let an acute
with the orthocenter
and
so that
denote
. Prove that
.
Proof. Observe that
,
and
are cyclically

is cyclically
.
PP5. Let the circles
,
with
and
,
,
so that
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
and the power
of the point
w.r.t. the circle
. Thus,
is the radical axis of
,
and


.
PP6. Let
,
and
be three points so that
and
. Let a mobile point
which belongs to the circle
. Find the maximum value of the sum
.
Proof. Let
,
. Apply the Stewart's to
in

(constant). Denote
. Obtain the equation
, i.e.
. This equation
has real roots
, i.e.
. Therefore, 
and
. In conclusion, the maximum value of the sum
is equally to
.
PP7 (Norvegia - 2014). Let
be a parallelogram and
so that
and
. Prove that the ray
is the bisector of
.
Proof 1.
and
and
. Thus,

is the bisector of the angle
Proof 2.
and
.
Observe that
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversal 
the ray
is the bisector of the angle
.
Remark. If denote
, then
. Indeed, the division
is harmonically, i.e.
and in this case
.
PP8. Let
and the midpoint
of the side
. Denote
so that
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Denote
. Thus,

. Define for
the equivalence
relation
. Therefore,

.
Proof 2. Denote
and
. Observe that
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to the transversal
and 
. Otherwise. Apply the theorem of Sines in the triangles

. Suppose that
and
. Thus,

. Apply the theorem of Sines in the triangles
. From the relations
and 
obtain that
, i.e.

what isn't truly. In conclusion,
, i.e.
.
PP9 (Cr. Tello). Let an
-right
and
,
,
so that
, i.e.
, where
is the
-excircle
a.s.o. Denote
. Prove that
, where
.
Proof. Denote
. Observe that
,
and

the relation
.
PP10. Let
and the
-bisector
. For
denote its incircle
and its
-excircle
.
For
denote its incircle
and its
-excircle
. Prove that
(standard notations).
Proof. The incircle and the
-excircle of
touch the sideline
at
,
respectively. The incircle and the
-excircle of
touch the sideline
at
,
respectively.
Let
, where
and
. Therefore,
. Thus,
. In conclusion,

.
Remark. Prove easily that the area
of
is given by the identity
. Thus,
.
PP11. Let a square
and
. Suppose that the circumcircles of
and
are tangent. Find the value of
.
Proof 1. Suppose w.l.o.g. that
. The
is acute and let its circumcircle
. The
is obtuse and let its circumcircle
, where
, where
is the bisector of
. Prove easily that
and
. Thus,

. Hence
. The circles
and 
are tangent
.
Proof 2 (Sunken Rock). Denote the midpoints
,
of the sides
,
which share the same perpendicular bisector
. So
and it belongs to the bisector of 
with
. Hence
and
.
Suppose
and call

.
PP12 (Extension). Let
be a triangle and consider the points
,
,
so that the perpendicular
lines from
,
,
on
,
,
are concurrently in the point
(the triangles
,
are orthologically !).
Define points
. Prove that the points
are concyclic.
Remark. See here a particular case - question 1 from day 1 at IMO 2008. Another particular case is
when
is the incenter and
,
,
are the tangent points of incircle with sides of the triangle
.
Proof.
the point
has same power w.r.t. the circles
and

the quadrilateral
is cyclically. Pove analogously the quadrilaterals
and 
are cyclically. Since the radical axis
,
,
aren't concurrently obtain that the points
are concyclically.
PP13. Let
be a triangle and consider the points
,
,
so that the perpendicular lines from
,
,
on
,
,
are concurrently in the point 
(the triangles
,
are orthologically !). Define points
. Prove that the points
are concyclic.
Proof.
has same power w.r.t.
and
is cyclic. Prove
analogously that
,
are cyclic. Since the radical axis
,
,
aren't concurrently obtain that
are concyclic. Remark. See here
a particular case - question 1 from day 1 at IMO 2008. Another particular case is when
is the incenter and
,
,
are the tangent points of incircle with sides of the triangle
.
PP14. Let an
-isosceles
with the diameter
of its circumcircle. For
of
let
be the parallelogram with
and
. Prove that 
Proof. Denote
, Thus,
. Denote
. Observe that
. In conclusion,
what is truly.
PP15. Let
with the incircle
which touches
at
,
and
. Is well-known
that
is the Gergonne's point. Prove that
is cyclically
.
Proof 1 (metric). Let
where
. Apply the Stewart's theorem to the cevian 
. Apply the Van Aubel's relation

. Thus,
is cyclic

.
Proof 2 (metric). Find easily that
. Observe that 
where
is the area of
. Thus,
is cyclic

![$(x+z)\cdot \left[z(x+y)^2+x(y+z)^2-xz(x+z)\right]=(x+y)\cdot\left[y(x+z)^2+x(y+z)^2-xy(x+y)\right]\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/f/2/9f29ea1e0abe11f111a928679282947516575855.png)

![$x(x+y)(x+z)(z-y)+x(z-y)(y+z)^2=x(z-y)\left[x^2+2x(y+z)+\left(y^2+yz+z^2\right)\right]\iff$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/0/c/40c24f95f23688159070811e47ee757e41678f44.png)
.
Remark. Denote
. Is well-known or can prove easily that
. Denote
. Since
is an harmonical division and
obtain that the ray
is the bisector of the angle
Lemma.
Prove that in
-right
there is the relation
where
Indeed, 
PP16. A line what pass by the vertex
of the square
cut the lines
and
in the points
and
Prove that there is the relation 
Method 1. Let
Hence
Aplly the lemma
to

Method 2. Let
Hence
Apply the lemma
to

Method 3.

Method 4.
PP17 (Kadir Altintas, Turkey). Let the semicircle
with the diameter
and the circle
what is tangent to
at
and interior tangent to
at
Prove that
Proof 1. Denote
so that
Observe that
Apply the Stewart's relation to
in 

On other hand

From the relations
and
obtain the required relation 
Proof 2. From the down-lemma
(well-known or prove easily) obtain that the ray
is the common bisector of
where
is the projection of
on 
Therefore,
Hence

a.s.o.
Lemma
.
Let the circles
where
is interior tangent to
at
and a line
what is tangent to
at
where
Then
is the interior
-bisector of 
Let the circles
where
is exterior tangent to
at
and a line
what is tangent to
at
where
Then
is the exterior
-bisector of
PP18 (Ahmed Faiz). Let
with circumcircle
so that
circumcircle
of
Prove that 
Proof. Denote
Observe that
because
and 
PP19 (Argentina Cono Sur TST 2014). Let
be the
-bisector of
where
and the circumcircle
of
Denote
so that
Prove that
where
is the circumcenter of 
Proof. Let
and
so that
Thus, 
Prove easily or is well known that
In conclusion,
i.e. 
PP20. Let
-isosceles
with the circumcenter
the incenter
and
so that
Prove that 
Denote
and the midpoint
of
Observe that
is cyclic and

is cyclic
i.e.





Proof. Let




i.e.





















Extension. Let






PP3 (O.I.M. - 2012). Let








Proof (metrical). Denote






























Hence














Remark.

![$4[BXC]=\left(XB^2+XC^2-BC^2\right)\tan\phi\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/1/4/41477b9c544c3183b1bbc1ef54a4427b504725db.png)
![$2pa=\left[\left(c^2+p^2-h^2\right)+\left(b^2+p^2-h^2\right)-a^2\right]\tan\phi$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/2/8/d28a1311bdcd4cb324a1543941c2e05621218a18.png)


An easy extension. Let an acute




and



PP4. Let an acute






Proof. Observe that










PP5. Let the circles









Proof. Denote


























PP6. Let








Proof. Let





(constant). Denote



has real roots





and



PP7 (Norvegia - 2014). Let






Proof 1.












Proof 2.



Observe that













Remark. If denote






PP8. Let


![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)



Proof 1. Denote










relation









Proof 2. Denote



















obtain that








PP9 (Cr. Tello). Let an













Proof. Denote













PP10. Let







For





Proof. The incircle and the










Let















Remark. Prove easily that the area



![$\frac {r_1R_1}{r_2R_2}=\frac {r_1R_1\cot\frac B2}{r_2R_2\cot\frac B2}=\frac {[DBA]}{[DBC]}=\frac {DA}{DC}=\frac ca$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/0/9/f0940e99e5f372438b84944255d3cac61d66718d.png)
PP11. Let a square





Proof 1. Suppose w.l.o.g. that







![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)




![$1+\frac 12\cdot\left[\cot\left(45^{\circ}-\phi\right)-\cot\left(45^{\circ}+\phi\right)\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/7/b/4/7b479f04b4679b29564fb79bee81036d20df82f6.png)



![$R_1+R_2=\frac 12\cdot\left[\frac 1{\sin \left(45^{\circ}+\phi\right)}+\frac 1{\sin \left(45^{\circ}-\phi\right)}\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/4/3/943e262b0546c9bb932f9edc6afd653e2eeddaa8.png)




are tangent







Proof 2 (Sunken Rock). Denote the midpoints


![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)
![$[CD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/7/0/e70960e9e5738a46ad23f794e796ef3cb4ad7e2c.png)



with






Suppose







PP12 (Extension). Let




lines from









Define points


Remark. See here a particular case - question 1 from day 1 at IMO 2008. Another particular case is
when





Proof.













are cyclically. Since the radical axis




PP13. Let











(the triangles




Proof.











analogously that






a particular case - question 1 from day 1 at IMO 2008. Another particular case is when





PP14. Let an


![$[AD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/3/0f3e4c424371b27673db323ced8ef0777940c0d4.png)






Proof. Denote







PP15. Let






that



Proof 1 (metric). Let

















Proof 2 (metric). Find easily that


where






![$(x+z)\cdot \left[z(x+y)^2+x(y+z)^2-xz(x+z)\right]=(x+y)\cdot\left[y(x+z)^2+x(y+z)^2-xy(x+y)\right]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/f/2/9f29ea1e0abe11f111a928679282947516575855.png)

![$x(x+y)(x+z)(z-y)+x(z-y)(y+z)^2=x(z-y)\left[x^2+2x(y+z)+\left(y^2+yz+z^2\right)\right]\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/0/c/40c24f95f23688159070811e47ee757e41678f44.png)



Remark. Denote







Lemma.






PP16. A line what pass by the vertex







Method 1. Let






Method 2. Let






Method 3.








Method 4.






PP17 (Kadir Altintas, Turkey). Let the semicircle

![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)






Proof 1. Denote










On other hand










Proof 2. From the down-lemma







Therefore,






![$\frac {Rr^2\left[(R-2r)+R\right]}{(R-r)^2}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/1/5/41591f5968891ee209d87c01ef3f182ef8708494.png)



Lemma



























PP18 (Ahmed Faiz). Let









Proof. Denote





PP19 (Argentina Cono Sur TST 2014). Let











Proof. Let








PP20. Let







Denote


![$[AB].$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/6/4/264577404140cd39a4b68d919fc0a13d5815fac5.png)







is cyclic












This post has been edited 279 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Sep 8, 2016, 4:57 PM