341. Some nice and interesting "slicing" problems.
by Virgil Nicula, Apr 29, 2012, 3:02 AM
PP1. Let
be an
-isosceles triangle. The bisector of
meet
in
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote
. Sinus' theorem in the triangles
and


.
Proof 2 (trigonometric). Observe that
. Denote
so that
and
. Thus,

and

.
Proof 3. Thus,
. Let
so that
. So

.
PP2. Let
be the
-right-angled isosceles triangle whose equal sides have length
. For
let the feet of the perpendiculars from
to the other sides are
and
. Consider the areas of the triangles
,
and the area of the rectangle
. Prove that regardless of how
is chosen, the largest of these three areas is at least
.
Proof. Denote
and
. Prove easily that 
and
. Thus,
.
PP3.
is an equilateral triangle. Extend
to
and extend
to
such that
. Prove that the triangle
is
-isosceles.
Proof 1 (own). Construct the isosceles trapezoid
, where
. Observe that 
i.e.
and
, what means that the quadrilateral
is a parallelogram, i.e.
.
Proof 2. Denote
. Thus,
. Appear two cases :
.
If denote the midpoint
of
, then
, i.e.
. Since
is
-isosceles.
Proof 3. Let
(ray) so that
. Since
is equilateral, so
. Hence
. So
is isosceles with
, which means it is also an equilateral triangle. Now, we have
. So
. So finally
.
Proof 4.
.
Remark. Let
so that
and
. Prove easily that
, i.e.
.
PP4. In
-isosceles
a trisector of angle
intersects
at
. Suppose that
and
. Ascertain
.
Proof 1. Suppose w.l.o.g.
. Thus,
exists
so that
and
. Apply the Stewart's relation to the cevian
in

. Since
obtain that
.
PP5. Let
be an inside point of
and
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote
. Apply the trigonometrical form of the Ceva's theorem:

Proof 2 (synthetic). Denote
and
so that
. Observe that
and
is equilateral. Thus,
, i.e. the triangle
is
-isosceles and
, i.e.
.
Extension. For
let the
-isosceles triangle
with
and its interior
so that
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Denote
. Apply the trigonometrical form of the Ceva's theorem:
.
Proof 2 (synthetic - own). Denote
and
so that
. Observe that 
and
is equilateral. Thus,
, i.e. the triangle
is
-isosceles and
. Nice extension !
PP6. Let
be an
-isosceles triangle with the
-altitude
where
and with the
-angle bisector
where
so that
. Find
.
Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote
. Thus,
.
Proof 2 (metric).

.
Proof 3. Let
and
so that
. Thus,
.
Proof 4. Denote
and
so that
. Thus,
. Thus,

.
Proof 5 (synthetic). Denote
and
so that
is a rhombus. Thus,
the trapezoid
is isosceles
.
Proof 6 (metric). Denote
, i.e.
. Suppose
. Therefore, 
.
Proof 7 (metric). I"ll use the van Aubel's relation
in
with the incenter
and
. Therefore,
.
In conclusion,
.
An easy extension. Let
be a triangle and
. Prove that
.
Proof.

.
PP7. Let
and the midpoint
of
. Suppose that
and
. Findthe measure of
.
Proof VN1.



because
.
Proof VN2.
. Thus

. In conclusion,
.
Proof (synthetical - Sunken Rock). From
it yields that
and
. Construct the
-right and isosceles
so that
separates
and
. Prove easily that
, i.e. the point
is the circumcenter of
. In conclusion, 
PP8. Let
be a triangle with
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote
, i.e.
and apply the trigonometric form of the Ceva's theorem : 

.
Proof 2 (synthetic). Denote
,
and the symetrical point
of
w.r.t.
. Observe that
,
is equilateral ,
and
is
-isosceles. Therefore,
and
. In conclusion,
.
An easy extension. Let
be a triangle with
, where
. Prove that
.
PP9. Let
with
. Denote
so that
. Suppose that
. Find
.
Proof 1 ("slicing"). Denote
and
so that
is equilateral. Prove easly that 
and
. Therefore,
is the circumcenter of
and
. In conclusion,
.
Proof 2 (trigonometric). Denote
, i.e.
. Apply an well-known relation


.
PP10. Let
be an
-right triangle and
be a point
is a point such that
. Let
be a point such that
and let
be a point such that
is the midpoint of
.opposite
pass
. Prove that
.
Proof. Problem asks to prove
. Also, as given, we easily can see that
. Take
on
such that 
, so
is cyclic and
bisector of
. Taking
midpoint of
we infer that
, so
and
, but
and
midpoint of
implies
isosceles with
. Prove easily that
.
Equivalent enunciation. Let an
-isosceles
with
and let
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
and
. Thus,
and
. Apply in
the
well-known relation
.
Apply analogously same relation in



. In conclusion,
, i.e.
.
PP11. Let
be a parallelogram. For an interior point
of
denote
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
and
. Thus,
and 
. Apply Menelaus' theorem to
.
From
obtain that
, i.e.
. Therefore,

is cyclically
.
PP12. Let
-isosceles
and bisector
of
. Let
so that
and circumcenter
of
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Let the midpoint
of
. Thus,
because

is cyclic
.
Proof 2. Denote
,
and
,
. Let the midpoint
of
and
. Thus,
and 
. Therefore,
and
.
Apply an well-known relation

.
PP13. Let equilateral
and
. The perpendicular line from
to
cut the perpendicular line from
to
at
. Let the mid-point
of
. Find
.
Proof. Denote the midpoints
and
of
and
respectively. Thus,
,
, 
- the circle with diameter
.
PP14. Let
be an
-isosceles triangle with
. Construct the
-isosceles
so that
and the line
separates
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1.
, what is true.
Proof 2. Let
so that
. Prove easily that
and
. In conclusion,
.
Proof 3. Let
. Prove easily that
is a kite. So
and
is equilateral.
PP15. Let
and an interior
for which
. Find
.
Proof 1. Denote
and
. Observe that
. Thus,


.
Proof 2 (synthetic - Sunken Rock). Let
be the circumcenter of
. Oviously,
is equilateral and
. Therefore,
is
isosceles, i.e.
and
, consequently
.
An easy extension. Let
and an interior point
for which
.
Prove that
.
Proof (trigonometric). Denote
and
. Observe that
. Thus,

. In conclusion,
.
Remark.

. So
, where
.
PP16. Let
. Suppose that exists an interior
of
so that
and
. Find
.
Proof. Let a fixed
-isosceles
with
. Suppose w.l.o.g.
. For two mobile points
so that
and
(these angles are constant, i.e. the line
has a constant slope) denote
and
. Therefore,
is a mobil point for which
and
. Thus, if
increases, then
,
increase and
decreases. Hence exists and is unique the position of the mobile point
so that
.
I"ll show that this position is feasiblely when
and
, i.e.
. Indeed,
and 



because

, what is falsely because
.
PP17. Let
. Find
, where
is the midpoint of
.
Proof 1 (metric). Apply theorem of Sine :

.
Proof 2 (synthetic). Let
be the circumcircle of
. Prove easily that the
is echilateral and the ray
is the bisector
. Thus,
.
Proof 3 (metric). Apply completly theorem of Sine :
. Suppose w.l.o.g. that 
. Otherwise. Denote
.
Thus,
.
Proof 4 (metric). Denote
so that
and suppose w.l.o.g.
. Prove easily that
,
,
,
and
.
Proof 5 (synthetic - Sayan). Construct an equilateral
such that
. Since
is
-isosceles with
obtain
collinear. Hence
and
is right isosceles. Hence
implying
is
-isosceles. Hence
implying
.
Remarks. There is generally the angular relation
, where
is the midpoint of
.
Easy extension.
.
Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g. that
. Thus,
and


.
PP18. Let
be a triangle and
be a point such that
. Suppose
that
and
. Find
.
Proof. Remark that
and
. I"ll show the well-known identity
. Indeed,
, what is truly.
Now I"ll apply the theorem of Sines:


.






Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote
















Proof 2 (trigonometric). Observe that


















Proof 3. Thus,













PP2. Let



![$P\in [AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/5/9/359020c23a881cb45d32ce380d41da09862a97c3.png)








Proof. Denote

![$\left\{\begin{array}{ccc}
m=[AQP] & = & \frac {x^2}{2}\\\\
n=[BRP] & = & \frac {(1-x)^2}{2}\\\\
p=[CQPR] & = & x(1-x)\end{array}\right\|$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/8/8/1881b7bfaa5e0703ea060797c54df8f0e6310a8f.png)




PP3.








Proof 1 (own). Construct the isosceles trapezoid



i.e.




Proof 2. Denote



If denote the midpoint

![$[CD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/7/0/e70960e9e5738a46ad23f794e796ef3cb4ad7e2c.png)






Proof 3. Let










Proof 4.



Remark. Let





PP4. In








Proof 1. Suppose w.l.o.g.














PP5. Let





Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote


Proof 2 (synthetic). Denote










Extension. For







Proof 1. Denote


Proof 2 (synthetic - own). Denote




and





PP6. Let










Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote







Proof 2 (metric).











Proof 3. Let









Proof 4. Denote












Proof 5 (synthetic). Denote












Proof 6 (metric). Denote









Proof 7 (metric). I"ll use the van Aubel's relation





In conclusion,






An easy extension. Let



Proof.












PP7. Let


![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)



Proof VN1.






















Proof VN2.
















Proof (synthetical - Sunken Rock). From













PP8. Let



Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote
















Proof 2 (synthetic). Denote















An easy extension. Let




PP9. Let






Proof 1 ("slicing"). Denote










Proof 2 (trigonometric). Denote









PP10. Let









![$[FC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/a/5/da58ad91251a620996294c1ad8676335558eec39.png)



Proof. Problem asks to prove





















Equivalent enunciation. Let an





Proof. Denote





well-known relation






Apply analogously same relation in
















PP11. Let






Proof. Denote










From









PP12. Let









Proof 1. Let the midpoint

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)








Proof 2. Denote





![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)













Apply an well-known relation









PP13. Let equilateral










Proof. Denote the midpoints


![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
![$[BD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/2/6/3261e689901bce018ecdef47b9bc60a78ead3746.png)






![$[BD]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/d/7/bd7d4abfe201a23d2a779966ff6230adf3144e48.png)


PP14. Let










Proof 1.





Proof 2. Let





Proof 3. Let




PP15. Let




Proof 1. Denote




















Proof 2 (synthetic - Sunken Rock). Let










An easy extension. Let



Prove that

Proof (trigonometric). Denote















Remark.







PP16. Let






Proof. Let a fixed



















I"ll show that this position is feasiblely when












![$\cos 40^{\circ}[\cos 50^{\circ}+\cos (30^{\circ}+2x)]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/2/a/92ae7d5cecc5c95005f7cc1e0b4d9e9ed9267457.png)
























PP17. Let



![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
Proof 1 (metric). Apply theorem of Sine :








Proof 2 (synthetic). Let






Proof 3 (metric). Apply completly theorem of Sine :









Thus,





Proof 4 (metric). Denote










Proof 5 (synthetic - Sayan). Construct an equilateral

![$\{A,D\}\subset [BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/a/3/4a3a40b91693e129e9d28d08d25cef9a10900577.png)











Remarks. There is generally the angular relation


![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
Easy extension.


Proof. Suppose w.l.o.g. that














PP18. Let



that



Proof. Remark that










Now I"ll apply the theorem of Sines:













This post has been edited 207 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Nov 18, 2015, 12:55 PM