378. Some metrical relations.
by Virgil Nicula, Jun 11, 2013, 7:36 PM
PP1. Let
-isosceles
with the incenter
and circumcenter
. Let the lengths
and
of the the
-bisector
and the
-bisector respectively. Prove that
, where
is the midpoint of
.
Method 1. Let
where
,
on the
-bisector
, where
. Thus,
,
. Thus, 
is an isosceles trapezoid, where
. So
, i.e.
.
Thus,
, i.e.
is a rhombus, i.e.
.
Method 2. Let
, where
, the
-bisector
, where
. Thus,

. In conclusion,
, what means that
is a rhombus, i.e.
.
Method 3 (metric). Denote
-bisector
, where
and
,
. Thus,

. In conclusion,
, what means that
is a rhombus, i.e.
.
PP2. Prove that in any
have
, where
are the lengths of the
-altitude and the
-bisector respectively. Particular case. If
, then there is the chain of equivalencies
.
Proof. Denote
so that
and
so that
and
. Since
obtain that
. Thus, 
. Observe that
. Apply the theorem
of Sines in
. Using
obtain that 
.
PP3. In
let
so that
and
. Prove that 
, where
are the lengths of the
-median and the
-bisector.
Proof. Denote the midpoint
of the
-bisector
, where
. Thus,
and
. Therefore,
is an isosceles
trapezoid, i.e.
. In conclusion,
.
PP4. Let
be a triangle and
,
be two points for which denote
. Prove that :
is tangential
.
If for
denote the tangent points
,
,
,
, then exists
, where
.
Exists
which is tangent to sidelines of
and
and in this case
is an extangentially.
See here => http://jl.ayme.pagesperso-orange.fr/Docs/Urquhart.pdf "the most elementary theorem of Euclidean geometry".
Proof. Suppose that
is a tangential quadrilateral and denote the tangent points
,
,
,
. Therefore:
.
.
Let
and apply Menelaos'
and
.
.
PP5. Let
,
be exterior circles and let
be a circle exterior tangent to circles
,
in
,
respectively. An exterior common tangent to the
circles
,
touches these in
,
respectively so that
separates
,
. Prove that
is cyclic and
are concurrently.
Proof.

Therefore,
is a cyclical quadrilateral. Denote
and apply
the Menelaus's theorem to the points
and
.
PP6. Let a rectangle
and
,
so that
is equilateral. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
. Observe that
. Suppose w.l.o.g.
.
Thus,

, what is truly.
Extension. A rectangle
,
,
. Then

Proof 1. Denote
and
. Is well-known that

, where
is the area of
. Prove easily that
. The relation
becomes
![$ay\left[\left(b^2+x^2\right)-(ax+by)\right]=$](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/4/d/44d72fd03ccc0a8351f97fa6284fe5d9b5b613e5.png)
, what is truly. In conclusion,
is truly.
Remark. I used
in
, where
.Indeed,

Proof 2 With same notations from the upper proof show that the identity
using the following relations 
.
.
.
Proof 3. Let
. Observe that
and
.
Therefore,
. Obtain that 

, what is truly.
PP7. Let
and an interior point
for which
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
. Thus,
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to 
.
PP8. Let the
-right-angled
and its
-excircle
. Denote 
and
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
. Thus,
and
, i.e.
. Since
we get
, i.e.
and
. So

. Thus have
.
PP9. Let an isosceles trapezoid
with
so that
is a diameter of its circumcircle
.
For
so that
separates
and
, let
. Prove that
is constant.
Proof 1 (metric). Let
. Thus,

and
. Therefore,

because
.
Proof 2. Let
. Thus,
and 
.
In conclusion,
(constant).
Particular case.
with 
.
Proof 3 (Cristhian Centeno).
. So

. Denote
so that
. Prove
easily that
and

(constant).
PP10. Let
and
. Consider
and
so that
and
are the
-symmedians in
and
respectively.
Denote
. Prove that :
.
Proof. Denote
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to 


Thus, the relation
, what is evidently. Apply Ceva's theorem to
and
in the mentioned
and
respectively :


In conclusion,
Thus,


, what is truly. Observe that
.
PP11 (Edson Curahua). Let
be a semicircle with the diameter
. For a point
define
the semicircles
,
with the diameters
respectively so that
.
Construct the circle
which is interior tangent to
and is exterior tangent to
and
. Prove thst the distance
.
Proof. Observe that
and
. Apply Stewart's relation in


Denote
. If
, then
and the area
. In conclusion, the distance
from the point
to the line
is given by the relation
, i.e.
. Prove easily that
and
is
.
PP12 (Ruben Auqui Caceres). Let
be a semicircle with the diameter
and a point
for which denote
so that
and
. Consider the incircle
of
and the circle
which is interior tangent to
in the point 
and which is tangent to the rays
,
in the points
,
respectively. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote
and from the
- right
obtain that
.
Prove easily that
and
. The inradius of
is given by the relation 
.
Therefore,
and
. Denote
. Thus,
i.e.
.
Therefore,
. Apply the Ptolemy's theorem to 
. In conclusion, the ratio
.
PP13. Let a rectangle
with
,
and the circle
with the diameter
.
For
so that
separates
and
let
. Prove that
.
Proof. Denote

. Particular case
becomes
.
PP14. Let
so that
separates
,
and exist
, where I denoted
- an open interval. Prove that
is an harmonical division, i.e.
what means that
,
are harmonical conjugate w.r.t.
,
.
Proof. Let
and
. Thus,

. But
. Thus,

.
PP15 (lemma). Let
be a convex quadrilateral for which denote
. Consider
,
. Then
.
Proof. Denote
, where
. Using the well-known relations 
obtain equivalencies

.
PP16 (Ruben Auqui). Let a square
with
and
. For
let the midpoint
of
and the intersection
. Prove that
is tangent to
.
Proof. Denote
, where
. Thus,
and
. Apply the Menelaus' theorem to
. Observe that
is tangent to

. From the relations
obtain that 
.
PP17. Let
and
so that
. For
construct the squares
and
. Prove that
,
Proof. Denote the point
so that
is a square and
. Apply the generalized Pythagoras' 
.
.
Prove easily that
. In conclusion,
.
PP18. Let
be a convex quadrilateral with
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (metric). Denote
and
. Observe that
and 
. Using the well-known identity

. In conclusion,
.
Proof 2 (trigonometric). Observe that
.
PP19. Let
and an interior point
for which denote
. Prove that
, where
is the area of the
.
Proof. Apply the Menelaus's theorem
.
PP20 (Miguel Ochoa Sanchez). Let
with
. Prove that the area
of the triangle
is given by the relation
.
Proof.
is acute and
. Thus,
and 
. Therefore,

. Since
obtain from the relations
and
, i.e.
. In conclusion, using the well-known identity
and the relations
and
obtain finally that
, i.e. the required relation
. I used
. Observe that
.
PP21 (Ruben Huillca). Let
with circumcircle
. The circle
is tangent to
, 
and is exterior tangent to
. Prove that
, where
is the
-excircle of
.
Proof. Denote
. Thus,
, i.e.
and


. Thus,
.
PP22. Let
be a circle with the diameter
and
be a point for which denote
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1. Prove easily that the ray
is the bisector of
, i.e.
.
Proof 2. Let
. Theorem of Sines in
.So
i.e.
.
Extension. Let
with the circumcircle
and
. Let
and 
so that
. Prove that
.
PP23. Prove that in any triangle
there is the following equivalence:
.
Proof 1 (metric).
.
Proof 2 (trigonometric).

.
Remark.
.







and the




![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)
Method 1. Let




![$[AD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/3/0f3e4c424371b27673db323ced8ef0777940c0d4.png)




is an isosceles trapezoid, where




Thus,



Method 2. Let



![$[AD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/f/3/0f3e4c424371b27673db323ced8ef0777940c0d4.png)












Method 3 (metric). Denote



















PP2. Prove that in any










Proof. Denote













of Sines in






^2=a^3c\iff$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/9/5/c952168d1685bbdc519588f046624081819ad15c.png)

PP3. In









Proof. Denote the midpoint


![$[BD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/2/6/3261e689901bce018ecdef47b9bc60a78ead3746.png)




trapezoid, i.e.





PP4. Let
























See here => http://jl.ayme.pagesperso-orange.fr/Docs/Urquhart.pdf "the most elementary theorem of Euclidean geometry".
Proof. Suppose that






















PP5. Let







circles









Proof.



Therefore,




the Menelaus's theorem to the points







PP6. Let a rectangle




![$[ABE]=X\ ,\ [ADF]=Y\ ,\ [CEF]=Z\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/8/5/985654b3d2e3b048db2ae26ed02b7d178a613167.png)

Proof. Denote




Thus,







Extension. A rectangle



![$:\ \left\{\begin{array}{c}
[ABE]=X\ ,\ [ADF]=Y\ ,\ [CEF]=Z\\\\
m\left(\widehat{AFE}\right)=\alpha\ ,\ m\left(\widehat{AEF}\right)=\beta\ ,\ m\left(\widehat{EAF}\right)=\gamma\end{array}\right\|\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/e/b/debd058187ee9183a40640bb6b704fe97b459fc9.png)

Proof 1. Denote





![$\frac 1{4\cdot [AEF]}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/b/adb0057b601465428bdff6018c19159d2a5a94c7.png)
![$[AEF]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/1/3/c/13c70c42a7bfa54d17fc9289b2134a7a1fd4abcf.png)






![$bx\left[\left(a^2+y^2\right)-(ax+by)\right]+$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/1/4/f142de8107fb990f37b20e106e7c8ad534aa4dca.png)
![$ay\left[\left(b^2+x^2\right)-(ax+by)\right]=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/4/d/44d72fd03ccc0a8351f97fa6284fe5d9b5b613e5.png)




Remark. I used


![$S=[ABC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/3/a/b3ae3d445111e4dd28be75922309d3270079368c.png)




Proof 2 With same notations from the upper proof show that the identity














Proof 3. Let




Therefore,








PP7. Let





Proof. Denote








PP8. Let the





and


Proof. Denote





















PP9. Let an isosceles trapezoid


![$[CD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/7/0/e70960e9e5738a46ad23f794e796ef3cb4ad7e2c.png)

For






Proof 1 (metric). Let










![$2R-[2d+(x+y)]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/8/f/28f0d43c34cd1ed5b6af9bcc56cb15df67828030.png)




because
![$d[2(R-d)-(x+y)]=2Rd-2d^2-d(x+y)\stackrel{(1)}{=}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/b/e/6be9ff389c81d1b9a5447f084deeb92d4925e176.png)

Proof 2. Let







![$2(R-d)-[h(\tan x+\cot x)-2d]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/7/7/97704d57f0cffa943ce04cccc3f507a0e4ce56ef.png)

In conclusion,


Particular case.





Proof 3 (Cristhian Centeno).





![$2R-[2d+(x+y)]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/2/8/f/28f0d43c34cd1ed5b6af9bcc56cb15df67828030.png)



easily that






![$xy=d[2(R-d)-(x+y)]\stackrel{(2)}{\implies}$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/7/d/57d27fef46e0a1fbbe25f6de336ee7aefd7cb155.png)


PP10. Let









Denote


![$\sqrt[3]{\frac {VC}{VM}\cdot\frac {WM}{WA}}\ ;\ PR\parallel AC\ ;\ \frac {VC}{VM}\cdot\frac {WA}{WM}\ge 4$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/d/6/3d6a128808cd1bf252ba199cd8b8380bb03457d1.png)
Proof. Denote
















Thus, the relation




















In conclusion,



![$\frac {MC}{MA}=\sqrt[3]{\frac {VC}{VM}\cdot\frac {WM}{WA}}\ .$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/c/8/6c805a761e90695cd55621bd3cc9b717a267760b.png)














PP11 (Edson Curahua). Let

![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)

the semicircles


![$[AC]\ ,$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/6/e/1/6e12d67d19cbed5cac0510150cbffc8f6fdc8ce9.png)
![$[CB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/f/0/a/f0a45a13c6123c357e7ffe7d05e50e68ad7d157a.png)

Construct the circle





Proof. Observe that












![$S=[PRQ]=\sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)}\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/7/f/37f301ef3ebba210cd2a910eaa28f00c603f5574.png)









PP12 (Ruben Auqui Caceres). Let

![$[AB]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/d/a/ada6f54288b7a2cdd299eba0055f8c8d19916b4b.png)









and which is tangent to the rays





Proof. Denote






Prove easily that




![$2\left[-(1+x)+\sqrt{2(1+x)}\right]+\sqrt{2(1+x)}=$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/d/a/bda73c38c8685e7feacbd63dfa12de4f0e66d482.png)






Therefore,






Therefore,









PP13. Let a rectangle




![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)
For






Proof. Denote













PP14. Let






![$[PAB]\cdot [PCD]=[PBC]\cdot [PAD]\iff (A,M,N,D)$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/b/6/0/b60995bb8eb89f032fd45b86ec33df8ca52070f9.png)





Proof. Let


![$[PAB]\cdot [PCD]=[PBC]\cdot [PAD]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/5/0/8/5089d131e819bfaf9cc623c42cb3d1c4d98cd441.png)



















PP15 (lemma). Let





Proof. Denote



obtain equivalencies














PP16 (Ruben Auqui). Let a square





![$[YC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/4/5/945f77a1cbd4eb5059d6dd2c05273628a3ff56ce.png)



Proof. Denote



















PP17. Let







Proof. Denote the point










Prove easily that


![$OX^2+OY^2=6+2[(\sin 2u-\cos 2v)+(\sin 2v-\cos 2u)]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/3/5/7/35720e5d91984c8d38edcb167496070cc3a1f954.png)

PP18. Let




Proof 1 (metric). Denote










Proof 2 (trigonometric). Observe that


PP19. Let



![$[ABC]\cdot [DPE]=[APC]\cdot [DBE]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/2/6/d26ed0daa38eab7e4a1b945d09bbb51fa9316594.png)
![$[XYZ]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/c/7/6/c7608a3e97e44fc5bcf0cd62a1f7dfc0a0a2e7d4.png)

Proof. Apply the Menelaus's theorem



![$\frac {[ABC]}{[DBE]}=\frac {[APC]}{[DPE]}\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/8/c/d/8cd09270756a20c954aed11632f4d20c2f43a698.png)
![$[ABC]\cdot [DPE]=[APC]\cdot [DBE]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/d/2/6/d26ed0daa38eab7e4a1b945d09bbb51fa9316594.png)
PP20 (Miguel Ochoa Sanchez). Let





Proof.



























PP21 (Ruben Huillca). Let





and is exterior tangent to





Proof. Denote






























PP22. Let

![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)




Proof 1. Prove easily that the ray






Proof 2. Let









Extension. Let





so that


PP23. Prove that in any triangle


Proof 1 (metric).






Proof 2 (trigonometric).









Remark.
![$a^2=4S\tan\frac A2+2aR\tan\frac A2\left[1-\cos (B-C)\right]\implies$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/a/2/f/a2f6477b82e4bfa00fe1044d04b1f8f615dacc3b.png)

This post has been edited 262 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Jul 7, 2016, 4:23 PM