298. Some nice problems from Crux Mathematicorum.
by Virgil Nicula, Jul 17, 2011, 1:43 AM
Proposed problem 2011. Let
with the incircle
. Let
and
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote
. Thus,
. Therefore,



. Similarly obtain that
.
Multiply the relation
by
and the relation
by
we get 
.
Remark. The relations
,
can write thus

.
Proof 2 (metric). Observe that
. Apply the Sinus' theorem in
.
Therefore,
. Since 
, obtain that

. Analogously obtain that
.
In conclusion,

.
Proposed problem 2153. Suppose that
. If for all
we have
, then prove that
.
Proof. Let
and
. Then by assumption
, 
and
. Hence

for all
.
Proposed problem 2151.
is a triangle with
. Let
be the foot of the perpendicular from 
to
and let
be the point on the side
where the excircle touches
. Prove that
.
Proof 1 (synthetic). Since
obtain that
. Construct the point
so that
and
. Observe that
the triangle
is
-isosceles and
. Thus,
, i.e.
.
Proof 2 (metric). From an well-known (or prove easily) property
, 
and
obtain that
.
Thus,
.
Here is a proof of the well-known property
. Denote
for[/b] which
, i.e.
. Therefore, 
and
. Otherwise. Construct the point
so that 
and
. Observe that
,
,
and
.
Proposed problem 3009. Let
be a triangle with the incircle
. Denote
. Prove that
is greater than, equal to or less than
according is
greater than, equal to or less than
.
Proof.

, where
.
For example,
.





Proof 1 (trigonometric). Denote











Multiply the relation












Remark. The relations










Proof 2 (metric). Observe that



Therefore,











In conclusion,







Proposed problem 2153. Suppose that

![$x\in [-1,1]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/f/9/4f921d6d2b004395d37ffb47b78a62e789b49aaa.png)


Proof. Let




and










![$x\in [-1,1]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/f/9/4f921d6d2b004395d37ffb47b78a62e789b49aaa.png)
Proposed problem 2151.




to


![$[BC]$](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/e/a/1/ea1d44f3905940ec53e7eebd2aa5e491eb9e3732.png)


Proof 1 (synthetic). Since











Proof 2 (metric). From an well-known (or prove easily) property


and





Thus,





Here is a proof of the well-known property





and






and







Proposed problem 3009. Let







Proof.








For example,

This post has been edited 78 times. Last edited by Virgil Nicula, Nov 21, 2015, 7:51 AM